Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (MONMON1768239310)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Money Mart's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Money Mart Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Money Mart breach identified under incident ID MONMON1768239310.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Money Mart's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/moneymart, the number of followers: 23060, the industry type: Financial Services and the number of employees: 1438 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 760 and after the incident was 599 with a difference of -161 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Money Mart and their customers.
On 01 December 2025, Money Mart disclosed Data Breach, Ransomware issues under the banner "Money Mart Data Breach".
Payday loan company Money Mart notified victims of a November 2025 data breach that compromised names and Social Security numbers.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Third-party application, and exposing Names, Social Security numbers, employee-related documents, with nearly 80,000 files records at risk.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Victim notification, credit monitoring offer.
The case underscores how Ongoing, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering 12 months complimentary credit monitoring through TransUnion (enrollment deadline: 2026-04-30).
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including hackers infiltrated a third-party application, and third-party application compromise. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to files in a third-party application and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating names, Social Security numbers, employee-related documents compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 80,000 files, including personal data of U.S. and Canadian customers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Yes, and 80,000 files...allegedly stole. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), with evidence including type such as Ransomware, and everest ransomware group claimed responsibility. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to files in a third-party application and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating forensic investigation is ongoing, key details remain undisclosed. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Money Mart Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/moneymart/incident/MONMON1768239310
- Money Mart CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/moneymart
- Money Mart Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/monmon1768239310-money-mart-crc-group-ransomware-january-2026/
- Money Mart CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/moneymart/history
- Money Mart CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.comparitech.com/news/money-mart-warns-data-breach-leaked-ssns-cybercriminals-take-credit/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf