Comparison Overview

Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore)

VS

China Guangfa Bank

Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore)

18 George Street, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH2 2PF, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-16 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
http://www.moneydashboard.com

Strong

Money Dashboard is a personal financial assistant that shows you exactly where money goes and helps you make better decisions. Use it to connect to all your current accounts, savings accounts and credit cards from whichever institutions you bank with, all together in one secure place. Money Dashboard is the only place which gives you the true view of your finances, so you can keep an eye on your day-to-day spending, and monitor whether you’re earning more than you’re spending, and making efficient use of any credit. It even lets you know if you’re likely to have any spare money left to spend at the end of the month. And for those who want to save, Money Dashboard uses your past spending patterns to predict future outgoings and potential savings so you can budget realistically for the future.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

China Guangfa Bank

None
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000
http://www.gdb.com.cn

China Guangfa Bank (CGB), founded in September 1988 with the approval of the State Council and People’s Bank of China as a piloting bank for the Chinese financial policy reform, is one of the earliest-incorporated joint stock commercial banks. CGB's continuous expansion over more than two decades of endeavor serves as the testimony of every progress China has achieved in economic liftoff and financial policy reform. By the end of December 2010, it has total assets amounting to RMB 814.7 billion. For over 20 years of development, CGB has been striving to build itself from a regional bank into a national joint stock commercial bank with competitive edge and influence, extending its footprints to all major regions in mainland China and the Macao SAR. The Bank has establish 29 branches directly under Head Office and a total of 544 outlets, 676 self-service banks and over 3600 self-service facilities in economically-advanced cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Hangzhou, Nanjing and Macao.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/money-dashboard.jpeg
Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore)
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-guangfa-bank.jpeg
China Guangfa Bank
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
China Guangfa Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Guangfa Bank in 2025.

Incident History — Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — China Guangfa Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Guangfa Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/money-dashboard.jpeg
Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-guangfa-bank.jpeg
China Guangfa Bank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China Guangfa Bank company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, China Guangfa Bank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) company.

In the current year, China Guangfa Bank company and Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither China Guangfa Bank company nor Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither China Guangfa Bank company nor Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither China Guangfa Bank company nor Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) company nor China Guangfa Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) company nor China Guangfa Bank company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Money Dashboard (acquired by ClearScore) company employs more people globally than China Guangfa Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Quadient DS-700 iQ devices through 2025-09-30 might have a race condition during the quick clicking of (in order) the Question Mark button, the Help Button, the About button, and the Help Button, leading to a transition out of kiosk mode into local administrative access. NOTE: the reporter indicates that the "behavior was observed sporadically" during "limited time on the client site," making it not "possible to gain more information about the specific kiosk mode crashing issue," and the only conclusion was "there appears to be some form of race condition." Accordingly, there can be doubt that a reproducible cybersecurity vulnerability was identified; sporadic software crashes can also be caused by a hardware fault on a single device (for example, transient RAM errors). The reporter also describes a variety of other issues, including initial access via USB because of the absence of a "lock-pick resistant locking solution for the External Controller PC cabinet," which is not a cybersecurity vulnerability (section 4.1.5 of the CNA Operational Rules). Finally, it is unclear whether the device or OS configuration was inappropriate, given that the risks are typically limited to insider threats within the mail operations room of a large company.

Published
Date
2025-09-30
Updated
Date
2025-09-30
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Versions between 2.1.0 and 2.14.19, 3.2.0-rc1, 3.1.0-rc1 through 3.1.7, and 3.0.0-rc1 through 3.0.18 contain a race condition in the repository credentials handler that can cause the Argo CD server to panic and crash when concurrent operations are performed on the same repository URL. The vulnerability is located in numerous repository related handlers in the util/db/repository_secrets.go file. A valid API token with repositories resource permissions (create, update, or delete actions) is required to trigger the race condition. This vulnerability causes the entire Argo CD server to crash and become unavailable. Attackers can repeatedly and continuously trigger the race condition to maintain a denial-of-service state, disrupting all GitOps operations. This issue is fixed in versions 2.14.20, 3.2.0-rc2, 3.1.8 and 3.0.19.

Published
Date
2025-09-30
Updated
Date
2025-09-30
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Web Content translation in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via any rich text field in a web content article.

Published
Date
2025-09-30
Updated
Date
2025-09-30
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Keysight Ixia Vision has an issue with hardcoded cryptographic material which may allow an attacker to intercept or decrypt payloads sent to the device via API calls or user authentication if the end user does not replace the TLS certificate that shipped with the device. Remediation is available in Version 6.9.1, released on September 23, 2025.

Published
Date
2025-09-30
Updated
Date
2025-09-30
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /dashboard/notes endpoint of Syaqui Collegetivity v1.0.0 allows attackers to impersonate other users and perform arbitrary operations via a crafted POST request.

Published
Date
2025-09-30
Updated
Date
2025-09-30
References