Comparison Overview

Mondoperfecto

VS

Rotterdam Vormgeving

Mondoperfecto

None
Last Update: 2025-12-02

We are experts in web design,graphic design,creative advertising and brand promotion.Passion and dedication can be found in our projects. Over the last years we've worked on several assignments proving ourselves in any type of media. Perfection exists!! We've made it!!

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rotterdam Vormgeving

Europalaan 2B Utrecht, 3526 KS, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Rotterdam Vormgeving: grafische vormgeving, communicatie & concept visualisatie met oog en oor voor de wensen van de klant. Uit Utrecht! Mijn specialisatie is no-nonsense vormgeving met inhoud. Met oog en oor voor de wensen van de klant. Naast grafische vormgeving voor drukwerk behoren fotografie en webdesign ook tot de mogelijkheden. Het vertalen van complexe materie naar een helder beeld is één van mijn kwaliteiten. En, voor mij geldt dat de vorm altijd de inhoud moet ondersteunen en niet andersom. In de afgelopen jaren maakte ik: advertenties, concept visualisatie, dissertaties, factsheets, foto’s, flyers, infographics, logo’s, magazines, PowerPoint presentaties, productbladen, websites, wetenschappelijke posters en nog veel meer.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mondoperfecto.jpeg
Mondoperfecto
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rotterdam-vormgeving.jpeg
Rotterdam Vormgeving
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mondoperfecto
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rotterdam Vormgeving
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mondoperfecto in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rotterdam Vormgeving in 2025.

Incident History — Mondoperfecto (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mondoperfecto cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rotterdam Vormgeving (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rotterdam Vormgeving cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mondoperfecto.jpeg
Mondoperfecto
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rotterdam-vormgeving.jpeg
Rotterdam Vormgeving
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rotterdam Vormgeving company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mondoperfecto company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rotterdam Vormgeving company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mondoperfecto company.

In the current year, Rotterdam Vormgeving company and Mondoperfecto company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rotterdam Vormgeving company nor Mondoperfecto company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rotterdam Vormgeving company nor Mondoperfecto company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rotterdam Vormgeving company nor Mondoperfecto company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mondoperfecto company nor Rotterdam Vormgeving company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mondoperfecto nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mondoperfecto company nor Rotterdam Vormgeving company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Mondoperfecto nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mondoperfecto nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mondoperfecto nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mondoperfecto nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mondoperfecto nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mondoperfecto nor Rotterdam Vormgeving holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X