Comparison Overview

Monarch Color Corporation

VS

Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging)

Monarch Color Corporation

5327 Brookshire Blvd., Charlotte, NC, 28216, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Monarch accentuates the moments that matter most - when the ink first touches the substrate and when your customer receives the finished product. For 40 years, Monarch Color's comprehensive product line of performance inks and ink products have kept our customers one step ahead of the competition. INK BETTER, PRINT BETTER, BE BETTER

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging)

6958 Sierra Ct, Dublin, California, 94568, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18

All American Label & Packaging was born in 1995 out of a need for a premier full-service label company committed to excellence in product and service. We didn’t want to just supply products to our clients, we wanted to partner with them to deliver the best results possible to help build their success and drive their products to the top. Since day one, we have focused on providing innovative solutions, quality products, and uncompromising customer service, and have always offered our customers the benefits of a collaborative in-house team. We have become the company you can depend on. We continue to produce unparalleled results with our highly-skilled and dedicated team. Our ever-growing, state-of-the-art equipment and our premier selection of materials keep us ahead of the trends and allow us to take your projects to the next level. We are proud to have partnered with some of the top companies and brands, delivering unrivaled lead times and products from our two U.S. locations. Over the years we have added an in-house Creative Studio, grand format printing, prototyping, and digital plate making. We also offer shrink sleeves, folding cartons, and flexible packaging, all produced in-house. Whatever the industry, whatever the project, our team is here to get creative and innovate with you!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monarch-color-corporation.jpeg
Monarch Color Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/all-american-label.jpeg
Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Monarch Color Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monarch Color Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) in 2025.

Incident History — Monarch Color Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monarch Color Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/monarch-color-corporation.jpeg
Monarch Color Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/all-american-label.jpeg
Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Monarch Color Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Monarch Color Corporation company.

In the current year, Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) company and Monarch Color Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) company nor Monarch Color Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) company nor Monarch Color Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) company nor Monarch Color Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Monarch Color Corporation company nor Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Monarch Color Corporation nor Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Monarch Color Corporation company nor Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) company employs more people globally than Monarch Color Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Monarch Color Corporation nor Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Monarch Color Corporation nor Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Monarch Color Corporation nor Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Monarch Color Corporation nor Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Monarch Color Corporation nor Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Monarch Color Corporation nor Imprimus Labels and Packaging (Formerly All American Labels and Packaging) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L