Comparison Overview

Momentum for Health

VS

GGZ In de Bres

Momentum for Health

1922 The Alameda, San Jose, California, US, 95126
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The mission of Momentum for Health is to help individuals achieve mental and emotional health, discover and reach their potential, and fully participate in life. Momentum builds stronger communities by giving individuals affected by mental and emotional illness treatment, support, and opportunity to lead healthier lives. Our work is based on the knowledge that individuals who have a mental illness can, and do, recover through available, effective, culturally competent services that encourage self direction and hope. We are a private, nonprofit organization that relies on the generosity of individuals, foundations and corporations to support our services.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 347
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GGZ In de Bres

Zonnedauw 5, Drachten, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-23

GGZ In de Bres is een jonge organisatie met een hoog ambitieniveau met vestigingen in Drachten, Groningen, Assen en Lelystad. Op dit moment werken bij ons circa 100 medewerkers. Op basis van een christelijke visie bieden wij ambulante behandelingen aan kinderen, jongeren, volwassenen en ouderen vanuit diverse multidisciplinaire teams. Bovendien wordt er gewerkt met een deeltijd dagbehandelingprogramma. Onze missie: Op professionele wijze, in navolging van Christus, mensen met psychiatrische en psychosociale problemen, helpen tot heelheid te komen met zichzelf, hun omgeving en de Schepper.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/momentum-for-health.jpeg
Momentum for Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggz-in-de-bres.jpeg
GGZ In de Bres
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Momentum for Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GGZ In de Bres
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Momentum for Health in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GGZ In de Bres in 2026.

Incident History — Momentum for Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Momentum for Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GGZ In de Bres (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GGZ In de Bres cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/momentum-for-health.jpeg
Momentum for Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ggz-in-de-bres.jpeg
GGZ In de Bres
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Momentum for Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GGZ In de Bres company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GGZ In de Bres company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Momentum for Health company.

In the current year, GGZ In de Bres company and Momentum for Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GGZ In de Bres company nor Momentum for Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GGZ In de Bres company nor Momentum for Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GGZ In de Bres company nor Momentum for Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Momentum for Health company nor GGZ In de Bres company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Momentum for Health nor GGZ In de Bres holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GGZ In de Bres company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Momentum for Health company.

Momentum for Health company employs more people globally than GGZ In de Bres company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Momentum for Health nor GGZ In de Bres holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Momentum for Health nor GGZ In de Bres holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Momentum for Health nor GGZ In de Bres holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Momentum for Health nor GGZ In de Bres holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Momentum for Health nor GGZ In de Bres holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Momentum for Health nor GGZ In de Bres holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H