Comparison Overview

MOL Austria Handels GmbH

VS

TotalEnergies

MOL Austria Handels GmbH

Walcherstraße 11a, Wien, Wien, AT, 1020
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.molaustria.at

MOL Austria Group is a 100 % subsidiary of MOL Group, a leading international, integrated oil and gas company from Hungary, situated in the heart of Europe, with over 75 years of experience and a proven track record. Since 1975 MOL Austria Group has been doing business on the Austrian market and has been increasing steadily. www.molaustria.at Our Vision MOL Group keeps people moving ahead by discovering new ways of serving their energy needs better and creating value for generations to come. Our Mission Operating across and from Central Europe, MOL Group will systematically overcome all frontiers, inspired by its management and relying on the expertise of its people. Our Values Success and Growth - moving ahead Courage and Decisiveness - to act without fear and overcome frontiers Teamwork and Partnership - together, leaving no one behind Expertise and Responsibility - through more intelligent solutions

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

TotalEnergies

2, place Jean Millier - La Défense 6, Paris La Défense Cedex, 92078, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.totalenergies.com

Have you ever thought of offering your skills and expertise to a multinational company? Give your best to better energy and make the commitment with TotalEnergies. With over 500-plus professions in 130 countries, we offer high safety and environmental standards, strong ethical values, an innovation culture and wide-ranging career development. Be part of the global team whose mission is already shared by 105,000 employees : to be a world-class player in the energy transition

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 82,218
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mol-austria.jpeg
MOL Austria Handels GmbH
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalenergies.jpeg
TotalEnergies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MOL Austria Handels GmbH
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
TotalEnergies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MOL Austria Handels GmbH in 2026.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TotalEnergies in 2026.

Incident History — MOL Austria Handels GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MOL Austria Handels GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — TotalEnergies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TotalEnergies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mol-austria.jpeg
MOL Austria Handels GmbH
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/totalenergies.jpeg
TotalEnergies
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

TotalEnergies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MOL Austria Handels GmbH company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

TotalEnergies company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas MOL Austria Handels GmbH company has not reported any.

In the current year, TotalEnergies company and MOL Austria Handels GmbH company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither TotalEnergies company nor MOL Austria Handels GmbH company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

TotalEnergies company has disclosed at least one data breach, while MOL Austria Handels GmbH company has not reported such incidents publicly.

TotalEnergies company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while MOL Austria Handels GmbH company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MOL Austria Handels GmbH company nor TotalEnergies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MOL Austria Handels GmbH nor TotalEnergies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MOL Austria Handels GmbH company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to TotalEnergies company.

TotalEnergies company employs more people globally than MOL Austria Handels GmbH company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither MOL Austria Handels GmbH nor TotalEnergies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MOL Austria Handels GmbH nor TotalEnergies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MOL Austria Handels GmbH nor TotalEnergies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MOL Austria Handels GmbH nor TotalEnergies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MOL Austria Handels GmbH nor TotalEnergies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MOL Austria Handels GmbH nor TotalEnergies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References