Comparison Overview

MOCA Jacksonville

VS

Tulsa Garden Center

MOCA Jacksonville

333 N. Laura St., Jacksonville, 32202, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://mocajacksonville.unf.edu/

The Museum of Contemporary Art Jacksonville promotes the discovery, knowledge, and advancement of the art, artists, and ideas of our time. MOCA Jacksonville, a private nonprofit visual arts educational institution and cultural institute of the University of North Florida, serves the community and its visitors through exhibitions, collections, educational programs, and publications designed to enhance an understanding and appreciation of modern and contemporary art with particular emphasis on works created from 1960 to the present.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tulsa Garden Center

undefined, Tulsa, undefined, undefined, us
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tulsagardencenter.org

Tulsa Garden Center, located in historic Woodward Park, is a nonprofit organization whose mission is to provide a variety of horticultural and environmental education opportunities for the community and to serve as horticultural headquarters for the Tulsa area. A primary goal is to promote learning about plants through educational and recreational programs, while preserving the heritage of its historic building. Tulsa Garden Center fulfills its role as part of a larger botanical community by advocating responsible stewardship of plants and their habitats and frequently sponsors lectures, classes, shows and special events. Nearly 30 affiliated organizations call Tulsa Garden Center home for horticultural and environmental activities. The Center is open to the public with no admission charge on Tuesday - Saturday, 9:00 am until 4:00pm.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mocajax.jpeg
MOCA Jacksonville
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tulsa-garden-center.jpeg
Tulsa Garden Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MOCA Jacksonville
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tulsa Garden Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MOCA Jacksonville in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tulsa Garden Center in 2026.

Incident History — MOCA Jacksonville (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MOCA Jacksonville cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tulsa Garden Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tulsa Garden Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mocajax.jpeg
MOCA Jacksonville
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tulsa-garden-center.jpeg
Tulsa Garden Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tulsa Garden Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MOCA Jacksonville company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tulsa Garden Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MOCA Jacksonville company.

In the current year, Tulsa Garden Center company and MOCA Jacksonville company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tulsa Garden Center company nor MOCA Jacksonville company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tulsa Garden Center company nor MOCA Jacksonville company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tulsa Garden Center company nor MOCA Jacksonville company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville company nor Tulsa Garden Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville nor Tulsa Garden Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville company nor Tulsa Garden Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MOCA Jacksonville company employs more people globally than Tulsa Garden Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville nor Tulsa Garden Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville nor Tulsa Garden Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville nor Tulsa Garden Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville nor Tulsa Garden Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville nor Tulsa Garden Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MOCA Jacksonville nor Tulsa Garden Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References