Comparison Overview

Mobile Wellness Incorporated

VS

Sequoia Mental Health Services

Mobile Wellness Incorporated

None, None, Chicago, IL, US, 60617
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.mwiservices.org

Mobile Wellness Incorporated is dedicated to fostering mental wellness and empowerment within the Illinois and Indiana communities. We provide comprehensive mental health therapy, case management services, and advocate for access to resources that improve lives. Our focus on inclusivity, community partnerships, and innovative solutions drives us to create safer, healthier, and more resilient communities.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sequoia Mental Health Services

4585 SW 185th Ave, None, Beaverton, OR, US, 97078
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sequoiamhs.org

Sequoia Mental Health Services, Inc. (SMHS) is dedicated to providing assistance to people with psychiatric, emotional and developmental impairments. The support provided is aimed at maximizing self-sufficiency and productivity and offered with compassion, integrity and a profound respect for each individual’s strengths. At SMHS our goal is to surround the people we serve with a community that will engage, support and encourage them.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 89
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mobile-wellness-incorporated.jpeg
Mobile Wellness Incorporated
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sequoia-mental-health-services.jpeg
Sequoia Mental Health Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mobile Wellness Incorporated
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sequoia Mental Health Services
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mobile Wellness Incorporated in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sequoia Mental Health Services in 2026.

Incident History — Mobile Wellness Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mobile Wellness Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sequoia Mental Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sequoia Mental Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mobile-wellness-incorporated.jpeg
Mobile Wellness Incorporated
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sequoia-mental-health-services.jpeg
Sequoia Mental Health Services
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mobile Wellness Incorporated company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sequoia Mental Health Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sequoia Mental Health Services company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mobile Wellness Incorporated company.

In the current year, Sequoia Mental Health Services company and Mobile Wellness Incorporated company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sequoia Mental Health Services company nor Mobile Wellness Incorporated company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sequoia Mental Health Services company nor Mobile Wellness Incorporated company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sequoia Mental Health Services company nor Mobile Wellness Incorporated company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mobile Wellness Incorporated company nor Sequoia Mental Health Services company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mobile Wellness Incorporated nor Sequoia Mental Health Services holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mobile Wellness Incorporated company nor Sequoia Mental Health Services company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sequoia Mental Health Services company employs more people globally than Mobile Wellness Incorporated company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Mobile Wellness Incorporated nor Sequoia Mental Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mobile Wellness Incorporated nor Sequoia Mental Health Services holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mobile Wellness Incorporated nor Sequoia Mental Health Services holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mobile Wellness Incorporated nor Sequoia Mental Health Services holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mobile Wellness Incorporated nor Sequoia Mental Health Services holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mobile Wellness Incorporated nor Sequoia Mental Health Services holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References