Comparison Overview

mo'media

VS

Interview Magazine

mo'media

Schiekade 189, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, 3013, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.momedia.nl

mo'media is een onafhankelijke, innovatieve uitgeverij die niets liever doet dan kwalitatieve uitgaven maken op het gebied van reizen en vrije tijd. Onze uitgaven zijn altijd praktisch, up-to-date en verrassend en vaak voorzien van een handige app of een bijbehorend online platform. Zo helpen we jou je weekend of vakantie onvergetelijk te maken. We zijn al bijna 20 jaar een inspiratiebron voor vele reizigers. En we zijn er van overtuigd dat je met onze uitgaven meer uit je stedentrip, vakantie of vrije tijd haalt. Dat je meer geniet! Met een netwerk van lokale bloggers in onze favoriete steden houden we onze tips altijd betrouwbaar en relevant. Met onze time to momo-stedengidsen zijn we nu al marktleider in Nederland en Vlaanderen.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Interview Magazine

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.interviewmagazine.com/

Created in 1969 by Andy Warhol, Interview has, for the past half-decade, been built on a simple conceit: put two interesting people together and turn on a tape recorder. The publication of today unifies the best of Interview’s many eras — the film journal of the ’70s, the society rag of the ’80s, the Hollywood-obsessed monthly of the ’90s and aughts, and the fashion glossy of the teens—while making it feel fresh and alive and un-put-downable for the readers of now.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mo'media.jpeg
mo'media
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interview-magazine.jpeg
Interview Magazine
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
mo'media
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Interview Magazine
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for mo'media in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interview Magazine in 2025.

Incident History — mo'media (X = Date, Y = Severity)

mo'media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Interview Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interview Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mo'media.jpeg
mo'media
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interview-magazine.jpeg
Interview Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both mo'media company and Interview Magazine company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Interview Magazine company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to mo'media company.

In the current year, Interview Magazine company and mo'media company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Interview Magazine company nor mo'media company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Interview Magazine company nor mo'media company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Interview Magazine company nor mo'media company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither mo'media company nor Interview Magazine company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither mo'media nor Interview Magazine holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither mo'media company nor Interview Magazine company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Interview Magazine company employs more people globally than mo'media company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither mo'media nor Interview Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither mo'media nor Interview Magazine holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither mo'media nor Interview Magazine holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither mo'media nor Interview Magazine holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither mo'media nor Interview Magazine holds HIPAA certification.

Neither mo'media nor Interview Magazine holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References