Comparison Overview

Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council

VS

Corteva Agriscience

Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council

Minneapolis, 55401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 650 and 699

Our mission is to stand as a credible information resource, a trusted public-policy advocate, and a member-driven organization for the hemp industry throughout Minnesota.

NAICS: 111
NAICS Definition: Crop Production
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Corteva Agriscience

9330 Zionsville Rd., Indianapolis, Indiana, US, 46268
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849

Corteva Agriscience combines industry-leading innovations, high-touch customer engagement and operational execution to profitably deliver solutions for the world's most pressing agriculture challenges. Corteva generates advantaged market preference through its unique distribution strategy, together with its balanced and globally diverse mix of seed, crop protection, biologicals, and digital products and services. With some of the most recognized brands in agriculture and a technology pipeline well positioned to drive growth, the company is committed to maximizing productivity for farmers, while working with stakeholders throughout the food system as it fulfills its promise to enrich the lives of those who produce and those who consume, ensuring progress for generations to come.

NAICS: 111
NAICS Definition: Crop Production
Employees: 22,062
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mncannabiscoop.jpeg
Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corteva.jpeg
Corteva Agriscience
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Corteva Agriscience
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Farming Industry Average (This Year)

Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Farming Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corteva Agriscience in 2025.

Incident History — Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Corteva Agriscience (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corteva Agriscience cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mncannabiscoop.jpeg
Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: System Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/corteva.jpeg
Corteva Agriscience
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Corteva Agriscience company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Corteva Agriscience company has not reported any.

In the current year, Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council company has reported more cyber incidents than Corteva Agriscience company.

Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Corteva Agriscience company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Corteva Agriscience company nor Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Corteva Agriscience company nor Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council company nor Corteva Agriscience company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council nor Corteva Agriscience holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Corteva Agriscience company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council company.

Corteva Agriscience company employs more people globally than Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council company, reflecting its scale as a Farming.

Neither Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council nor Corteva Agriscience holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council nor Corteva Agriscience holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council nor Corteva Agriscience holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council nor Corteva Agriscience holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council nor Corteva Agriscience holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Minnesota Cannabis Growers Cooperative & Industry Council nor Corteva Agriscience holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X