Comparison Overview

Mizuno Corporation

VS

ELAN Group

Mizuno Corporation

Nanko Kita, Suminoe-ku, Osaka, None, JP, 1-12-35
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Contributing to society through the advancement of sporting goods and the promotion of sports. Sport plays a vital role in helping people lead a prosperous and comfortable lifestyle. By making determined efforts to providing better sporting goods through our manufacturing and marketing practices and by continuing to contribute to the promotion and development of sport, we are strongly committed to contributing to society. The MIZUNO Group, comprising MIZUNO Corporation and its 13 subsidiaries, is primarily engaged in the manufacturing and marketing of sporting goods, including baseball, golf and other sporting equipment, sportswear and footwear. The Group also operates sports facilities, including golf schools and futsal (five-a-side soccer) courts, as well as public facilities that MIZUNO operates under contract with governmental authorities.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 569
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

ELAN Group

Begunje 1, Begunje na Gorenjskem, undefined, 4275, SI
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Elan is one of the most innovative global sports products brands. Leading by innovation, Elan strives to enhance products in all segments to achieve the ultimate user experience. As a leading producer and supplier of sports and leisure time activities equipment, we have been present in global markets for over 75 years. All Elan’s enterprises are devoted to development of innovative products and progressive design through innovative approach and advanced technology. Elan’s production facilities are located in Central Europe - skis, sail yachts, and composite components, are all produced in Begunje, Slovenia. Elan owns four companies that market its products in Canada, USA, Germany & Austria, and Japan along with independent distributors around the world. For more check: www.elanskis.com www.elan-yachts.com www.elan-composites.com www.elan-inventa.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 171
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mizuno.jpeg
Mizuno Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elan-d.o.o..jpeg
ELAN Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mizuno Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ELAN Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mizuno Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ELAN Group in 2025.

Incident History — Mizuno Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mizuno Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ELAN Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ELAN Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mizuno.jpeg
Mizuno Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elan-d.o.o..jpeg
ELAN Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ELAN Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mizuno Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mizuno Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ELAN Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, ELAN Group company and Mizuno Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Mizuno Corporation company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ELAN Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ELAN Group company nor Mizuno Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ELAN Group company nor Mizuno Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mizuno Corporation company nor ELAN Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mizuno Corporation nor ELAN Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mizuno Corporation company nor ELAN Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mizuno Corporation company employs more people globally than ELAN Group company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Mizuno Corporation nor ELAN Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mizuno Corporation nor ELAN Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mizuno Corporation nor ELAN Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mizuno Corporation nor ELAN Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mizuno Corporation nor ELAN Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mizuno Corporation nor ELAN Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H