Comparison Overview

Mizuno Oceania Corporation

VS

SKLZ

Mizuno Oceania Corporation

17 Anzed Court, None, Mulgrave, Victoria, AU, 3170
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Founded by Rihachi Mizuno in 1906, Mizuno has developed into a brand globally recognised for its excellence in producing technical sports equipment. The Japanese company is still run by the Mizuno family from its Osaka HQ, with offices spread around the globe. A focus on product development has produced a legacy amongst Mizuno consumers across the sporting world. From highly customised golf clubs, through to technical running footwear, and highly evolved baseball equipment, Mizuno will never cease its "Kaizen"​ approach to product development - continuous improvement. Mizuno's greatest achievement, however, is to successfully compete in a highly competitive market, whilst remaining true to our core philosophy; "Contributing to society through the advancement of sporting goods and the promotion of sports"

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SKLZ

2081 Faraday Drive, Carlsbad, CA, 92008, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

SKLZ prepares athletes to be ready for their sport. The SKLZ brand offers skill and performance training products and programs for athletes to use at home and in training environments. Based in Carlsbad, California, SKLZ products are available around the world at major sporting goods retailers, specialty retailers, and at sklz.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mizuno-corporation-australia.jpeg
Mizuno Oceania Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pro-performance-sports.jpeg
SKLZ
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mizuno Oceania Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SKLZ
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mizuno Oceania Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SKLZ in 2025.

Incident History — Mizuno Oceania Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mizuno Oceania Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SKLZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SKLZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mizuno-corporation-australia.jpeg
Mizuno Oceania Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pro-performance-sports.jpeg
SKLZ
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mizuno Oceania Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SKLZ company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SKLZ company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mizuno Oceania Corporation company.

In the current year, SKLZ company and Mizuno Oceania Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SKLZ company nor Mizuno Oceania Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SKLZ company nor Mizuno Oceania Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SKLZ company nor Mizuno Oceania Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mizuno Oceania Corporation company nor SKLZ company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mizuno Oceania Corporation nor SKLZ holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mizuno Oceania Corporation company nor SKLZ company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SKLZ company employs more people globally than Mizuno Oceania Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Mizuno Oceania Corporation nor SKLZ holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mizuno Oceania Corporation nor SKLZ holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mizuno Oceania Corporation nor SKLZ holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mizuno Oceania Corporation nor SKLZ holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mizuno Oceania Corporation nor SKLZ holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mizuno Oceania Corporation nor SKLZ holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H