Comparison Overview

Mizna

VS

NewBeauty

Mizna

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Mizna is a critical platform for contemporary literature, art, film, and cultural programming centering the work of Arab and Southwest Asian and North African artists. We publish the literary journal Mizna: Prose, Poetry and Art Exploring Arab America, produce the Twin Cities Arab Film Festival, and support an exceptionally talented and diverse range of local, national, and international Arab American artists. For twenty years, we have sought to reflect the depth and multiplicity of our community and have been committed to being a space for Arab, Muslim, and other artists from the region to reclaim our narratives and engage audiences in meaningful and excellent art.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NewBeauty

101 Park Ave, New York, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

NewBeauty Magazine (newbeauty.com) is the definitive authority on all things beauty. Each issue of NewBeauty gives readers an in-depth look at the beauty industry’s latest products, cutting-edge innovations and breakthrough technologies. Whether it’s the latest high-powered skin care or in-office procedure, NewBeauty educates readers on the latest options for skin, face, hair, body, well-being and smile. The magazine’s comprehensive approach to its topics continues to solidify its reputation as the industry’s leading scientifically accurate, expert-driven and ethically balanced beauty resource. NewBeauty’s brand extensions include product-sampling service TestTube (testtube.newbeauty.com), which delivers exclusive products to readers’ doors every three months. NewBeauty is published by SANDOW (sandow.com), a leader in innovation and design that delivers powerful products, services and experiences to a highly selective audience.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mizna.jpeg
Mizna
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newbeauty.jpeg
NewBeauty
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mizna
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NewBeauty
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mizna in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NewBeauty in 2025.

Incident History — Mizna (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mizna cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NewBeauty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NewBeauty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mizna.jpeg
Mizna
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/newbeauty.jpeg
NewBeauty
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Mizna company and NewBeauty company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, NewBeauty company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mizna company.

In the current year, NewBeauty company and Mizna company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NewBeauty company nor Mizna company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NewBeauty company nor Mizna company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NewBeauty company nor Mizna company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mizna company nor NewBeauty company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mizna nor NewBeauty holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NewBeauty company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mizna company.

NewBeauty company employs more people globally than Mizna company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Mizna nor NewBeauty holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mizna nor NewBeauty holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mizna nor NewBeauty holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mizna nor NewBeauty holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mizna nor NewBeauty holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mizna nor NewBeauty holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.