Comparison Overview

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

VS

thyssenkrupp

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

2−3 Marunouchi 3-Chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 100-8332, JP
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) Group is one of the world’s leading industrial firms. For more than 130 years, we have channeled big thinking into solutions that move the world forward – advancing the lives of everyone who shares our planet. We deliver innovative and integrated solutions across a wide range of industries, covering land, sea, sky and even space. MHI Group is 80,000 strong in more than 200 companies worldwide, operating in various sectors: power & energy, industrial machinery, urban infrastructure, aerospace and defense. We have a consolidated revenue of around 40 billion USD, and have consistently been a Fortune Global 500 company since the list's inception. We aim to contribute to environmental sustainability while achieving global growth, using our leading-edge technologies. By bringing people and ideas together as one, we continue to pave the way to a future of shared success. Learn more about us at https://www.mhi.com See our solutions in action at https://spectra.mhi.com By accessing, using or interacting with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries on LinkedIn, you accept and agree to be bound by these guidelines: https://www.mhi.com/conditions/social.html

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 14,899
Subsidiaries: 33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

thyssenkrupp

thyssenkrupp Allee 1, None, Essen, None, DE, 45143
Last Update: 2025-11-22

thyssenkrupp is an international industrial and technology group with around 98,000 employees. In the fiscal year 2023/2024, the company generated sales of €35 billion in 47 countries. Its business activities are bundled in five segments: Automotive Technology, Decarbon Technologies, Materials Services, Steel Europe and Marine Systems. With extensive technology know-how, the businesses develop innovative solutions for the challenges of the future. Around 3,900 employees work in research and development worldwide. They are mainly focused on climate protection and the energy transition, the digital transformation in industry and the mobility of the future. The patent portfolio of thyssenkrupp currently includes approximately 16,900 patents and utility models. thyssenkrupp is pursuing ambitious climate protection targets and actively optimizing its own energy and climate efficiency. At the same time, the Group is supporting its customers with advanced products to help them achieve their climate targets, thus playing a key role in advancing the green transformation. As a publicly listed company, thyssenkrupp is part of the MDAX index. thyssenkrupp shares are traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (ticker symbol: TKA) and as American depositary receipts (ticker symbol: TKAMY) in the USA. If you have any HR related questions, please send us an e-mail to [email protected] or visit our global career site: https://karriere.thyssenkrupp.com/en Follow us on our social media career channels: Facebook: facebook.com/thyssenkruppcareer/ blog: https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/stories Imprint: https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/de/impressum.html Privacy policy: https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/legal-notes.html

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 36,513
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitsubishi-heavy-industries.jpeg
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thyssenkrupp.jpeg
thyssenkrupp
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
thyssenkrupp
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for thyssenkrupp in 2025.

Incident History — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — thyssenkrupp (X = Date, Y = Severity)

thyssenkrupp cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitsubishi-heavy-industries.jpeg
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/thyssenkrupp.jpeg
thyssenkrupp
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: theft of highly sensitive military/defense information (Royal Australian Navy submarine technical requirements)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to thyssenkrupp company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

thyssenkrupp company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has not reported any.

In the current year, thyssenkrupp company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither thyssenkrupp company nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither thyssenkrupp company nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

thyssenkrupp company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company nor thyssenkrupp company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor thyssenkrupp holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to thyssenkrupp company.

thyssenkrupp company employs more people globally than Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor thyssenkrupp holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor thyssenkrupp holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor thyssenkrupp holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor thyssenkrupp holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor thyssenkrupp holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor thyssenkrupp holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H