Comparison Overview

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

VS

Ingersoll Rand

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

2−3 Marunouchi 3-Chome, Chiyoda-ku, 100-8332, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.mhi.com

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) Group is one of the world’s leading industrial firms. For more than 130 years, we have channeled big thinking into solutions that move the world forward – advancing the lives of everyone who shares our planet. We deliver innovative and integrated solutions across a wide range of industries, covering land, sea, sky and even space. MHI Group is 80,000 strong in more than 200 companies worldwide, operating in various sectors: power & energy, industrial machinery, urban infrastructure, aerospace and defense. We have a consolidated revenue of around 40 billion USD, and have consistently been a Fortune Global 500 company since the list's inception. We aim to contribute to environmental sustainability while achieving global growth, using our leading-edge technologies. By bringing people and ideas together as one, we continue to pave the way to a future of shared success. Learn more about us at https://www.mhi.com See our solutions in action at https://spectra.mhi.com Explore job opportunities at https://www.mhi.com/recruit By accessing, using or interacting with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries on LinkedIn, you accept and agree to be bound by these guidelines: https://www.mhi.com/conditions/social.html

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 15,509
Subsidiaries: 33
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Ingersoll Rand

525 Harbour Place Drive, Suite 600, Davidson, 28036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.IRCO.com

Ingersoll Rand Inc. (NYSE:IR), driven by an entrepreneurial spirit and ownership mindset, is dedicated to Making Life Better for our employees, customers, shareholders, and planet. Customers lean on us for exceptional performance and durability in mission-critical flow creation and industrial solutions. Supported by over 80+ respected brands, our products and services excel in the most complex and harsh conditions. Our employees develop customers for life through their daily commitment to expertise, productivity, and efficiency. For more information, visit www.IRCO.com.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 15,111
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitsubishi-heavy-industries.jpeg
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingersoll-rand.jpeg
Ingersoll Rand
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ingersoll Rand
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ingersoll Rand in 2025.

Incident History — Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ingersoll Rand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ingersoll Rand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitsubishi-heavy-industries.jpeg
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingersoll-rand.jpeg
Ingersoll Rand
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ingersoll Rand company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ingersoll Rand company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company.

In the current year, Ingersoll Rand company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ingersoll Rand company nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ingersoll Rand company nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ingersoll Rand company nor Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company nor Ingersoll Rand company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor Ingersoll Rand holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ingersoll Rand company.

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company employs more people globally than Ingersoll Rand company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor Ingersoll Rand holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor Ingersoll Rand holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor Ingersoll Rand holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor Ingersoll Rand holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor Ingersoll Rand holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mitsubishi Heavy Industries nor Ingersoll Rand holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References