Comparison Overview

Woonin

VS

FONCIA

Woonin

Koningin Wilhelminalaan 9 Utrecht, Utrecht 3527 LA, NL
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Woonin is een woningcorporatie met duurzame en betaalbare huurwoningen voor mensen met een laag inkomen. Woonin zet zich in voor leefbare buurten en staat dichtbij huurders. Utrecht - Nieuwegein - Houten - Wijk bij Duurstede

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 201-500
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

FONCIA

Antony Paris, 92, FR
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Notre ambition : être l’acteur de confiance des services immobiliers résidentiels. Chiffres clés : 10 000 collaborateurs et collaboratrices, 600 agences 2 500 recrutements à l’année 700 alternants et alternantes + 6 000 jours de formation + 200 écoles et universités partenaires au niveau national et régional + 250 personnes formées au sein de la pépinière En 2023, Foncia a géré : 400 000 biens en gestion locative, 70 000 immeubles en gestion de copropriétés, + 35 000 biens proposés pour des locations vacances, 15 000 transactions. Retrouvez nous également sur : Twitter (@foncia) Facebook (@foncia) Instagram (@foncia) #àDOMICILE #OkFoncia

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitros.jpeg
Woonin
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foncia.jpeg
FONCIA
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Woonin
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FONCIA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woonin in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FONCIA in 2025.

Incident History — Woonin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woonin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FONCIA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FONCIA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitros.jpeg
Woonin
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foncia.jpeg
FONCIA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Woonin company and FONCIA company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, FONCIA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Woonin company.

In the current year, FONCIA company and Woonin company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FONCIA company nor Woonin company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither FONCIA company nor Woonin company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither FONCIA company nor Woonin company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Woonin company nor FONCIA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Woonin company nor FONCIA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Woonin company nor FONCIA company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.