Comparison Overview

Woonin

VS

Country Garden Group

Woonin

Koningin Wilhelminalaan 9 Utrecht, Utrecht 3527 LA, NL
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Woonin is een woningcorporatie met duurzame en betaalbare huurwoningen voor mensen met een laag inkomen. Woonin zet zich in voor leefbare buurten en staat dichtbij huurders. Utrecht - Nieuwegein - Houten - Wijk bij Duurstede

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 201-500
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Country Garden Group

345 Nathan Rd, None, Yau Tsim Mong, Hong Kong, HK, None
Last Update: 2025-06-07 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Forbes 500 500 Projects Globally Top 10 Real Estate Company in China Over the past 20 years, Country Garden has been a practitioner in China's urbanization, bringing modernization to landscape and improving the quality of people's lives. Besides Mainland China, Country Garden has also been actively expanding overseas markets since 2012, including Malaysia, Australia, Indonesia, India, Thailand, Myanmar, Laos, Russia, Vietnam, Britain, US and other countries. Pairing your unique skills with our global resources and expertise, Country Garden will give you the career you desire. For more information: http://www.bgy.com.cn/china/index.aspx

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15,707
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitros.jpeg
Woonin
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/country-garden-holding-co--ltd-.jpeg
Country Garden Group
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Woonin
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Country Garden Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woonin in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Country Garden Group in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Woonin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woonin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Country Garden Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Country Garden Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitros.jpeg
Woonin
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/country-garden-holding-co--ltd-.jpeg
Country Garden Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Woonin company and Country Garden Group company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Country Garden Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Woonin company.

In the current year, Country Garden Group company and Woonin company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Country Garden Group company nor Woonin company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Country Garden Group company nor Woonin company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Country Garden Group company nor Woonin company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Woonin company nor Country Garden Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Country Garden Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Woonin company.

Country Garden Group company employs more people globally than Woonin company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.