Comparison Overview

Mitel

VS

Vodafone

Mitel

350 Legget Drive, Kanata, Ontario, K2K 2W7, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Powering more than 2 billion connections every day, Mitel helps businesses connect, collaborate and take care of customers.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 3,913
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Vodafone

1 Kingdom Street, Paddington Central, London, GB, W2 6BY
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 650 and 699

At Vodafone, we believe that connectivity is a force for good. If we use it for the things that really matter, it can improve people's lives and the world around us. Through our technology we empower people, connecting everyone regardless of who they are or where they live, we protect the planet and help our customers do the same. But we’re not just shaping the future of technology for our customers – we’re shaping the future for everyone who joins our team too. When you work with us, you’re part of a global mission to connect people, solve complex challenges, and create a sustainable, more inclusive world. If you want to grow your career whilst finding the perfect balance between work and life, Vodafone offers the opportunities and support to help you belong and make a real impact. #TogetherWeCan

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 132,162
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitel.jpeg
Mitel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vodafone.jpeg
Vodafone
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mitel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Vodafone
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitel in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vodafone in 2025.

Incident History — Mitel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Vodafone (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vodafone cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitel.jpeg
Mitel
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Firmware Vulnerability (CVE-2024-41710)
Motivation: DDoS Botnet Recruitment
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Command Injection Attack
Motivation: Possible preparation for more stealthy and undetectable future variants
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of a vulnerability in Mitel MiVoice VOIP appliances
Motivation: Unauthorized access and data breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vodafone.jpeg
Vodafone
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Data Breach
Motivation: Unauthorized Access to Sensitive Data
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Mitel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Vodafone company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Vodafone company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Mitel company.

In the current year, Vodafone company and Mitel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Vodafone company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Mitel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Vodafone company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Mitel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Vodafone company and Mitel company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Mitel company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Vodafone company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mitel nor Vodafone holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Vodafone company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mitel company.

Vodafone company employs more people globally than Mitel company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Mitel nor Vodafone holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mitel nor Vodafone holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mitel nor Vodafone holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mitel nor Vodafone holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mitel nor Vodafone holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mitel nor Vodafone holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X