Comparison Overview

Mitel

VS

Telecom Egypt

Mitel

350 Legget Drive, Kanata, Ontario, K2K 2W7, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Powering more than 2 billion connections every day, Mitel helps businesses connect, collaborate and take care of customers.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 3,913
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Telecom Egypt

B7 Building, K28 Cairo Alex Desrt Road, Smart Village, Giza, EG
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Since its establishment in 1854, Telecom Egypt has played a pivotal role in driving growth within the local ICT market capitalizing on its vast infrastructure, which is one of the largest in the region. Its vast domestic and international infrastructure has helped it serve various customer groups including consumers, enterprises, domestic and international carriers. Through its five business units Telecom Egypt boasts a consolidated top-line of EGP 22.8bn. In September 2017, Telecom Egypt introduced its new retail brand “WE” with the launch of its mobile services. In a year from launch, “WE” offered the market’s first fully integrated bundle combining all of its consumer services fixed and mobile, voice and data in one bill taking its first step towards full convergence and demonstrating its agility as a key player in the telecommunications industry. By end of 2018, Telecom Egypt fixed voice customers grew to 7.9mn of which 5.2mn enjoyed fixed broadband connectivity, while mobile customers reached 3.9mn. Telecom Egypt’s wholesale unit provides infrastructure, transmission and international voice services to local mobile operators and internet service providers. In addition, it provides international carries capacities on one of the largest submarine cable networks in the world.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 17,990
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitel.jpeg
Mitel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telecom-egypt.jpeg
Telecom Egypt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mitel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Telecom Egypt
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitel in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Telecom Egypt in 2025.

Incident History — Mitel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Telecom Egypt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Telecom Egypt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitel.jpeg
Mitel
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Firmware Vulnerability (CVE-2024-41710)
Motivation: DDoS Botnet Recruitment
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Command Injection Attack
Motivation: Possible preparation for more stealthy and undetectable future variants
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of a vulnerability in Mitel MiVoice VOIP appliances
Motivation: Unauthorized access and data breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/telecom-egypt.jpeg
Telecom Egypt
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Telecom Egypt company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mitel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mitel company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Telecom Egypt company has not reported any.

In the current year, Telecom Egypt company and Mitel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Telecom Egypt company nor Mitel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Telecom Egypt company nor Mitel company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Mitel company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Telecom Egypt company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Mitel company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Telecom Egypt company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mitel nor Telecom Egypt holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mitel company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Telecom Egypt company.

Telecom Egypt company employs more people globally than Mitel company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Mitel nor Telecom Egypt holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mitel nor Telecom Egypt holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mitel nor Telecom Egypt holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mitel nor Telecom Egypt holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mitel nor Telecom Egypt holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mitel nor Telecom Egypt holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X