Comparison Overview

Mitel

VS

Bell

Mitel

350 Legget Drive, Kanata, Ontario, K2K 2W7, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Powering more than 2 billion connections every day, Mitel helps businesses connect, collaborate and take care of customers.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 3,913
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Bell

1 carrefour Alexandre-Graham-Bell, Montreal, Quebec, CA, H3E 3B3
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We advance how people connect with each other and the world #ConnectionIsEverything. Bell is Canada's largest communications company providing advanced Bell broadband wireless, Internet, TV, media and business communications services. Founded in Montréal in 1880, Bell is wholly owned by BCE Inc. To learn more, please visit Bell.ca or BCE.ca Through Bell for Better, we are investing to create a better today and a better tomorrow by supporting the social and economic prosperity of our communities. This includes the Bell Let's Talk initiative, which promotes Canadian mental health with national awareness and anti-stigma campaigns like Bell Let's Talk Day and significant Bell funding of community care and access, research and workplace initiatives throughout the country. To learn more, please visit Bell.ca/LetsTalk

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 33,541
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitel.jpeg
Mitel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bell.jpeg
Bell
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mitel
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bell
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitel in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bell in 2025.

Incident History — Mitel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitel.jpeg
Mitel
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Firmware Vulnerability (CVE-2024-41710)
Motivation: DDoS Botnet Recruitment
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Command Injection Attack
Motivation: Possible preparation for more stealthy and undetectable future variants
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of a vulnerability in Mitel MiVoice VOIP appliances
Motivation: Unauthorized access and data breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bell.jpeg
Bell
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Bell company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mitel company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mitel company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Bell company.

In the current year, Bell company and Mitel company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bell company nor Mitel company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Bell company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Mitel company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Mitel company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Bell company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Mitel company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Bell company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mitel nor Bell holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mitel company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bell company.

Bell company employs more people globally than Mitel company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Mitel nor Bell holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mitel nor Bell holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mitel nor Bell holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mitel nor Bell holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mitel nor Bell holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mitel nor Bell holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X