Comparison Overview

Mitchells Roberton

VS

Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors

Mitchells Roberton

36 North Hanover Street, Glasgow, Scotland, G1 2AD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Mitchells Roberton is a highly respected and trusted Scottish law firm and one of the oldest in the country. We are a medium sized firm offering a full range of legal services. Our aim is to provide advice for life – helping you at all times to achieve the best outcomes for you, your family and your business. You will find our experienced lawyers welcoming and responsive, always reacting quickly to resolve any legal issues which you may have. Our people are key to our ability to deliver excellent legal advice and we will work hard for each and every one of our clients. We pride ourselves in giving a cost effective, friendly and caring service.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors

25 Hardshaw Street, ST HELENS, Merseyside WA10 1RP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors, St Helens and Prescot, we have a down-to-earth and understanding approach to all our clients and their problems coupled with the necessary expertise and commitment to get results. We place great importance on getting to know you and understand your individual needs. In this way we can ensure that you are put in touch with the most appropriate person in our practice. Our offices are equipped with an expanding range of modern technology. This progressive approach ensures efficiency, accuracy and speed of response in the most cost effective way. We aim to keep you informed at every stage, thus ensuring that you are kept up to date with the progress of your matters and that you fully understand the efforts that are being made on your behalf.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitchells-roberton-solicitors.jpeg
Mitchells Roberton
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tickle-hall-cross.jpeg
Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mitchells Roberton
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitchells Roberton in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Mitchells Roberton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitchells Roberton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitchells-roberton-solicitors.jpeg
Mitchells Roberton
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tickle-hall-cross.jpeg
Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mitchells Roberton company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mitchells Roberton company.

In the current year, Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors company and Mitchells Roberton company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors company nor Mitchells Roberton company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors company nor Mitchells Roberton company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors company nor Mitchells Roberton company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mitchells Roberton company nor Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mitchells Roberton nor Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mitchells Roberton company nor Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mitchells Roberton company employs more people globally than Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Mitchells Roberton nor Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mitchells Roberton nor Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mitchells Roberton nor Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mitchells Roberton nor Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mitchells Roberton nor Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mitchells Roberton nor Tickle Hall Cross Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X