Comparison Overview

Mitchells & Butlers PLC

VS

Stonegate Group

Mitchells & Butlers PLC

27 Fleet Street, Birmingham, B31JP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1898, we're one of the largest operators of restaurants, pubs and bars in the UK, providing a wide choice of eating and drinking-out experiences through our well-known brands and delivering great service, quality and value for money to our guests.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 10,677
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stonegate Group

3 Monkspath Hall Road Shirley, England B90 4SJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-22

We’re the UK's biggest pub company, but that’s not all we are. We’re an incredible team bringing people together through our 4,500+ sites nationwide. Formed in 2010 with 333 pubs, Stonegate Group has grown bigger and better than ever, and today we’re home to well-loved sites such as Slug & Lettuce, Be At One, Walkabout, Popworld and so many more. But we didn’t get where we are just with great drinks and unforgettable experiences. We got here with the wonderful ideas and dedication of our team, from our front-line bar superstars to our head-office heroes and everyone in between. Without our team, we couldn’t have achieved all the brilliant things we have, and that’s why we’re here to make sure our colleagues are set up for just as much success as we are. With award-winning development programmes, proven Bar to Boardroom career pathways, apprenticeship opportunities to gain nationally-recognised qualifications, and training to learn fantastic new skills, we can prove that we value our colleagues just as much as our customers. We set up every part of our business for success, and we strive to be the best we can be for our guests and colleagues alike. Here at Stonegate, we live by our values. We invest wisely, we’re raring to go and we’re straightforward in all that we do. But above all, we’re one team, and we’re ready to take on the future together and have fun while we’re at it!

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitchells-&-butlers.jpeg
Mitchells & Butlers PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stonegate-pub-company-limited.jpeg
Stonegate Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mitchells & Butlers PLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stonegate Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitchells & Butlers PLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stonegate Group in 2025.

Incident History — Mitchells & Butlers PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitchells & Butlers PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stonegate Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stonegate Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitchells-&-butlers.jpeg
Mitchells & Butlers PLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stonegate-pub-company-limited.jpeg
Stonegate Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stonegate Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mitchells & Butlers PLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stonegate Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mitchells & Butlers PLC company.

In the current year, Stonegate Group company and Mitchells & Butlers PLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stonegate Group company nor Mitchells & Butlers PLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stonegate Group company nor Mitchells & Butlers PLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stonegate Group company nor Mitchells & Butlers PLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC company nor Stonegate Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor Stonegate Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mitchells & Butlers PLC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Stonegate Group company.

Mitchells & Butlers PLC company employs more people globally than Stonegate Group company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor Stonegate Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor Stonegate Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor Stonegate Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor Stonegate Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor Stonegate Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor Stonegate Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H