Comparison Overview

Mitchells & Butlers PLC

VS

DoubleTree by Hilton

Mitchells & Butlers PLC

27 Fleet Street, Birmingham, B31JP, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1898, we're one of the largest operators of restaurants, pubs and bars in the UK, providing a wide choice of eating and drinking-out experiences through our well-known brands and delivering great service, quality and value for money to our guests.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 10,677
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

DoubleTree by Hilton

7930 Jones Branch Drive, McLean, VA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

DoubleTree by Hilton hotels are distinctively designed properties that provide true comfort to today’s business and leisure travelers. From the millions of delighted hotel guests who are welcomed with the brand’s legendary, warm chocolate chip cookies at check-in to the advantages of the award-winning Hilton HHonors® guest reward program, each DoubleTree by Hilton guest receives a satisfying stay wherever their travels take them. With a growing collection of contemporary, upscale accommodations in more than 375+ gateway cities, metropolitan areas and vacation destinations worldwide. DoubleTree by Hilton is part of Hilton Worldwide (NYSE: HLT), a leading global hospitality company spanning the lodging sector from luxury and full-service hotels and resorts to extended-stay suites and focused-service hotels. For 95 years, Hilton Worldwide has been dedicated to continuing its tradition of providing exceptional guest experiences. The company’s portfolio of eleven world-class global brands is comprised of more than 4,100 managed, franchised, owned and leased hotels and timeshare properties, with more than 685,000 rooms in 92 countries and territories, including Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Waldorf Astoria Hotels & Resorts, Conrad Hotels & Resorts, Curio – A Collection by Hilton, DoubleTree by Hilton, Embassy Suites Hotels, Hilton Garden Inn, Hampton Hotels, Homewood Suites by Hilton, Home2 Suites by Hilton and Hilton Grand Vacations. The company also manages an award-winning customer loyalty program, Hilton Honors.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 15,099
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitchells-&-butlers.jpeg
Mitchells & Butlers PLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doubletree-hilton.jpeg
DoubleTree by Hilton
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mitchells & Butlers PLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DoubleTree by Hilton
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitchells & Butlers PLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DoubleTree by Hilton in 2025.

Incident History — Mitchells & Butlers PLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitchells & Butlers PLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DoubleTree by Hilton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DoubleTree by Hilton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitchells-&-butlers.jpeg
Mitchells & Butlers PLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/doubletree-hilton.jpeg
DoubleTree by Hilton
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: denial-of-service malware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 09/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale System
Blog: Blog

FAQ

DoubleTree by Hilton company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mitchells & Butlers PLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

DoubleTree by Hilton company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Mitchells & Butlers PLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, DoubleTree by Hilton company and Mitchells & Butlers PLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DoubleTree by Hilton company nor Mitchells & Butlers PLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

DoubleTree by Hilton company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Mitchells & Butlers PLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DoubleTree by Hilton company nor Mitchells & Butlers PLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC company nor DoubleTree by Hilton company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor DoubleTree by Hilton holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

DoubleTree by Hilton company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mitchells & Butlers PLC company.

DoubleTree by Hilton company employs more people globally than Mitchells & Butlers PLC company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor DoubleTree by Hilton holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor DoubleTree by Hilton holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor DoubleTree by Hilton holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor DoubleTree by Hilton holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor DoubleTree by Hilton holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mitchells & Butlers PLC nor DoubleTree by Hilton holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H