Comparison Overview

Mitab

VS

SteelSentry

Mitab

Fraktgatan 2, Tranås, 57341, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Mitab is a family-owned Swedish design company now in its second generation of leadership. 2019 marks Mitab’s 40th anniversary, a milestone that is tribute to our philosophy of simplicity, functionality, elegance in form and flexibility. The result is furniture that is innovative, intuitive and inspiring. A cadre of established and emerging designers striving for excellence and innovation drive the design of every Mitab product, which are manufactured responsibly in Sweden with the lightest environmental footprint possible. At Mitab we love what we do. We develop products with the intention to create freedom and ease for our users to focus their energy on their passion. We believe that passion creates great things. We help our users to create their own great things.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SteelSentry

undefined, Austin, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

SteelSentry is the leading manufacturer of technical, industrial and laboratory furniture in the United States. Since 2002, we have supported our customers around the world with exemplary customer service and high-quality products essential to their daily operations. Every day our team members employ their talent, commitment and innovation to serve our singular customer goal: Exceed Expectations. Our products are found throughout the Fortune 1000, Universities and all branches of the U.S. Government. Organizations such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Embraer, SpaceX, General Electric, DuPont, 3M, Shutterfly, Electrolux, Siemens, Sierra Nevada, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, The University of Texas, Harvard, Stanford, Johns Hopkins and countless more rely on SteelSentry products and our team of extremely talented employees.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitab.jpeg
Mitab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steelsentry.jpeg
SteelSentry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mitab
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SteelSentry
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitab in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SteelSentry in 2025.

Incident History — Mitab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SteelSentry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SteelSentry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitab.jpeg
Mitab
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/steelsentry.jpeg
SteelSentry
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SteelSentry company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mitab company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SteelSentry company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mitab company.

In the current year, SteelSentry company and Mitab company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SteelSentry company nor Mitab company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SteelSentry company nor Mitab company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SteelSentry company nor Mitab company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mitab company nor SteelSentry company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mitab nor SteelSentry holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mitab company nor SteelSentry company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mitab company employs more people globally than SteelSentry company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Mitab nor SteelSentry holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mitab nor SteelSentry holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mitab nor SteelSentry holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mitab nor SteelSentry holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mitab nor SteelSentry holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mitab nor SteelSentry holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.