Comparison Overview

Mission Hills China

VS

Wanda Cultural Industry Group

Mission Hills China

Mission Hills Road Shenzhen, 518110, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Mission Hills China, owner and operator of Mission Hills Shenzhen and Mission Hills Resort Hainan, is a key player in the country’s fledgling sports and leisure industry. The Mission Hills brand encompasses several sub-brands, including Mission Hills Golf Clubs, Mission Hills Residences, as well as Mission Hills Hotels & Resorts. It is also the host, promoter and underwriter of several major golf tournaments, including the Omega Mission Hills World Cup and the Mission Hills Star Trophy. The company employs approximately 11,000 people across its two operations.

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wanda Cultural Industry Group

Tower B, Wanda Plaza, No. 93 Jianguo Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing Beijing, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Wanda Cultural Industry Group is China’s largest cultural enterprise, with assets of 90.3 billion yuan and annual revenue of 51.2 billion yuan in 2015.It owns four companies – film holdings, sports holdings, tourism holdings and children’s entertainment. This sector is gradually emerging as one of Wanda’s core businesses. By 2020, Wanda Cultural Industry Group aims to be ranked among the top five cultural companies in the world in terms of revenue. 万达文化产业集团是中国最大的文化企业,2016年收入641.1亿元,旗下包括影视、体育、旅游等公司,目标是2020年成为收入排名全球前五的文化企业。

NAICS: 713
NAICS Definition: Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mission-hills-china.jpeg
Mission Hills China
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wanda-cultural-industry-group.jpeg
Wanda Cultural Industry Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mission Hills China
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wanda Cultural Industry Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Recreational Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mission Hills China in 2025.

Incidents vs Recreational Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wanda Cultural Industry Group in 2025.

Incident History — Mission Hills China (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mission Hills China cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wanda Cultural Industry Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wanda Cultural Industry Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mission-hills-china.jpeg
Mission Hills China
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wanda-cultural-industry-group.jpeg
Wanda Cultural Industry Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Mission Hills China company and Wanda Cultural Industry Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Wanda Cultural Industry Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mission Hills China company.

In the current year, Wanda Cultural Industry Group company and Mission Hills China company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wanda Cultural Industry Group company nor Mission Hills China company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wanda Cultural Industry Group company nor Mission Hills China company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wanda Cultural Industry Group company nor Mission Hills China company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mission Hills China company nor Wanda Cultural Industry Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mission Hills China nor Wanda Cultural Industry Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mission Hills China company nor Wanda Cultural Industry Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Mission Hills China company and Wanda Cultural Industry Group company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Mission Hills China nor Wanda Cultural Industry Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mission Hills China nor Wanda Cultural Industry Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mission Hills China nor Wanda Cultural Industry Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mission Hills China nor Wanda Cultural Industry Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mission Hills China nor Wanda Cultural Industry Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mission Hills China nor Wanda Cultural Industry Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H