Comparison Overview

Mirage Studio

VS

Karina Lax Photography

Mirage Studio

None
Last Update: 2025-12-15
Between 800 and 849

Mirage Studio since 2005 provides Wedding and Product protography. We make fine arts photography also. .

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Karina Lax Photography

Springvale Road Sheffield, England, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 700 and 749

Portrait, documentary and music photography Show more Show less

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Mirage Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/karina-lax-photography.jpeg
Karina Lax Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mirage Studio
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Karina Lax Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mirage Studio in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Karina Lax Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Mirage Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mirage Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Karina Lax Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Karina Lax Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Mirage Studio
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/karina-lax-photography.jpeg
Karina Lax Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mirage Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Karina Lax Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Karina Lax Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mirage Studio company.

In the current year, Karina Lax Photography company and Mirage Studio company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Karina Lax Photography company nor Mirage Studio company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Karina Lax Photography company nor Mirage Studio company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Karina Lax Photography company nor Mirage Studio company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mirage Studio company nor Karina Lax Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mirage Studio nor Karina Lax Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mirage Studio company nor Karina Lax Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mirage Studio company employs more people globally than Karina Lax Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Mirage Studio nor Karina Lax Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mirage Studio nor Karina Lax Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mirage Studio nor Karina Lax Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mirage Studio nor Karina Lax Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mirage Studio nor Karina Lax Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mirage Studio nor Karina Lax Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N