Comparison Overview

Minnesota Reformer

VS

Alabama Reflector

Minnesota Reformer

undefined, Saint Paul, MN, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://minnesotareformer.com/

The Minnesota Reformer is an independent, nonprofit news organization dedicated to keeping Minnesotans informed and unearthing stories other outlets can’t or won’t tell. We’re in the halls of government tracking what elected officials are up to — and monitoring the powerful forces trying to influence them. But we’re also on the streets, at the bars and parks, on farms and in warehouses, telling you stories of the people being affected by the actions of government and big business. And we’re free. No ads. No paywall.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Alabama Reflector

Montgomery, Alabama, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
https://alabamareflector.com/

The Alabama Reflector is an independent nonprofit website covering politics and policy in our state. We look at the problems affecting Alabamians, and search for solutions. We connect readers with the decisions made in the hallways of the State House and try to give a voice to those outside it. We write stories about people in power and men and women on the margins. We hope to reflect what our home is, and what it could be.

NAICS: 5191311
NAICS Definition: Internet Publishing and Broadcasting and Web Search Portals
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-reformer.jpeg
Minnesota Reformer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-reflector.jpeg
Alabama Reflector
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Minnesota Reformer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Alabama Reflector
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Reformer in 2026.

Incidents vs Internet News Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alabama Reflector in 2026.

Incident History — Minnesota Reformer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Reformer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Alabama Reflector (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alabama Reflector cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-reformer.jpeg
Minnesota Reformer
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alabama-reflector.jpeg
Alabama Reflector
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Minnesota Reformer company and Alabama Reflector company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Alabama Reflector company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Minnesota Reformer company.

In the current year, Alabama Reflector company and Minnesota Reformer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Alabama Reflector company nor Minnesota Reformer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Alabama Reflector company nor Minnesota Reformer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Alabama Reflector company nor Minnesota Reformer company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Minnesota Reformer company nor Alabama Reflector company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Minnesota Reformer nor Alabama Reflector holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Alabama Reflector company and Minnesota Reformer company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Both Minnesota Reformer company and Alabama Reflector company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Minnesota Reformer nor Alabama Reflector holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Minnesota Reformer nor Alabama Reflector holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Minnesota Reformer nor Alabama Reflector holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Minnesota Reformer nor Alabama Reflector holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Minnesota Reformer nor Alabama Reflector holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Minnesota Reformer nor Alabama Reflector holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References