Comparison Overview

Minnesota Department of Human Services

VS

State of California

Minnesota Department of Human Services

540 Cedar Street, Saint Paul, MN, US, 55155
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://mn.gov/dhs

The Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) helps provide essential services to Minnesota’s most vulnerable residents. Working with many others, including counties, tribes and non-profits, DHS helps ensure that Minnesota seniors, people with disabilities, children and others meet their basic needs and have the opportunity to reach their full potential DHS employs a highly talented and dedicated workforce committed to providing services that produce positive outcomes for clients in a cost-effective manner. Employees have an opportunity to make a difference in the lives of Minnesotans every day. Be a part of growing team of talented professionals! Career opportunities at DHS Public policy analysts Human Service Technicians (Direct Care) Administrative and executive assistants Accountants and auditors Budget and business analysts Doctors and pharmacists Mental Health Professional Educators Human Resources Licensed Alcohol & Drug Counselor Nurses and nursing assistants Physical therapists Rehabilitation therapists Researchers, planners and data analysts Social workers Attorneys Health care administrators Eligibility and benefits representatives Interns and fellows

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 1,925
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3
View Profile

State of California

Sacramento, None, Sacramento, California, US, 95814
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ca.gov

Californians deserve a government that works for them and with them. One that will work to ensure opportunity and justice. We are building a California not for the few, but for all — including those who have historically been left out. We are doing the work to make our state a place for every Californian and all the diversity that makes us strong. Our state will be known as a place where everyone is respected, protected, and connected.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 44,043
Subsidiaries: 29
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
29
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-department-of-human-services.jpeg
Minnesota Department of Human Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-california.jpeg
State of California
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Minnesota Department of Human Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State of California
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Department of Human Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State of California in 2025.

Incident History — Minnesota Department of Human Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Department of Human Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State of California (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of California cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-department-of-human-services.jpeg
Minnesota Department of Human Services
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2020
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Compromise
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-california.jpeg
State of California
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Email
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Dissemination
Blog: Blog

FAQ

State of California company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Minnesota Department of Human Services company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

State of California company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Minnesota Department of Human Services company.

In the current year, State of California company has reported more cyber incidents than Minnesota Department of Human Services company.

State of California company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Minnesota Department of Human Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both State of California company and Minnesota Department of Human Services company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither State of California company nor Minnesota Department of Human Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Minnesota Department of Human Services company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while State of California company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Minnesota Department of Human Services nor State of California holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

State of California company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Minnesota Department of Human Services company.

State of California company employs more people globally than Minnesota Department of Human Services company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Minnesota Department of Human Services nor State of California holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Minnesota Department of Human Services nor State of California holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Minnesota Department of Human Services nor State of California holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Minnesota Department of Human Services nor State of California holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Minnesota Department of Human Services nor State of California holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Minnesota Department of Human Services nor State of California holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References