Comparison Overview

Minnesota Center for Psychology

VS

NAMI Central Florida

Minnesota Center for Psychology

2324 University Ave West, Saint Paul, MN, 55114, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.minnesotacenterforpsychology.com/

Minnesota Center for Psychology (MCP) is a private clinic that offers comprehensive mental health services to children, adolescents and adults. It was established in 2009 by a group of clinicians who are committed to providing the best quality care for their clients in an environment that fosters integrity, respect, hope, health and learning. MCP is conveniently located in the Midtown Commons building on University Avenue near Highways 94 and 280 in St. Paul, MN. There is a bus stop near the clinic and the light rail’s Green Line Raymond stop is directly in front of the building. Ample free parking is available on both sides of the building. Most types of insurance are accepted, as is private pay.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NAMI Central Florida

Altamonte Springs, Florida, US, 32701
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799
http://www.namigo.org/

Founded in 1986, the National Alliance on Mental Illness Greater Orlando (NAMIGO) is an organization dedicated to the eradication of the stigma associated with mental health and to the improvement of the quality of life for all whose lives are affected by these conditions. NAMI Greater Orlando is affiliated with NAMI Florida, Inc., an organization that includes more than 30 local affiliates and 2,000 members across the state of Florida. NAMIGO serves Orange and Seminole counties.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-center-for-psychology.jpeg
Minnesota Center for Psychology
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nami-central-florida.jpeg
NAMI Central Florida
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Minnesota Center for Psychology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NAMI Central Florida
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Center for Psychology in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAMI Central Florida in 2026.

Incident History — Minnesota Center for Psychology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Center for Psychology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NAMI Central Florida (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAMI Central Florida cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-center-for-psychology.jpeg
Minnesota Center for Psychology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nami-central-florida.jpeg
NAMI Central Florida
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Minnesota Center for Psychology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAMI Central Florida company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NAMI Central Florida company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Minnesota Center for Psychology company.

In the current year, NAMI Central Florida company and Minnesota Center for Psychology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NAMI Central Florida company nor Minnesota Center for Psychology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NAMI Central Florida company nor Minnesota Center for Psychology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NAMI Central Florida company nor Minnesota Center for Psychology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Minnesota Center for Psychology company nor NAMI Central Florida company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Minnesota Center for Psychology nor NAMI Central Florida holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Minnesota Center for Psychology company nor NAMI Central Florida company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Minnesota Center for Psychology company employs more people globally than NAMI Central Florida company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Minnesota Center for Psychology nor NAMI Central Florida holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Minnesota Center for Psychology nor NAMI Central Florida holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Minnesota Center for Psychology nor NAMI Central Florida holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Minnesota Center for Psychology nor NAMI Central Florida holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Minnesota Center for Psychology nor NAMI Central Florida holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Minnesota Center for Psychology nor NAMI Central Florida holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References