Comparison Overview

Mingei International Museum

VS

The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum

Mingei International Museum

1439 El Prado, San Diego, California, US, 92101-1617
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Mingei International Museum preserves and exhibits folk art, craft and design from all eras and cultures of the world. Mingei celebrates human creativity, and the belief that everyday object and materials that often serve a useful purpose can also be objects of beauty. Art can happen anywhere—in any culture, in any place, created by any person. The Museum’s collection now comprises more than 25,000 objects of folk art, craft and design from 141 countries. A non-profit institution funded by admission, individuals, and community support, the Museum offers inspiring exhibitions and diverse educational programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum

215 Giles Street, Havre de Grace, MD, 21078, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum, Inc. is a public museum organized and operated to collect, document, preserve, and interpret waterfowl decoys as a unique form of folk art that is a distinctive element in the cultural landscape of this region – the Lower Susquehanna River and the Upper Chesapeake Bay. The Decoy Museum will engage and educate visitors with exceptional exhibits that describe the centuries-old history of waterfowling as well as the interplay among this region, its people, the environment, and the folk art of decoy making. By so doing, the Decoy Museum will preserve knowledge of these cultural traditions, encourage comprehensive understanding of the history of decoy folk art, and transmit this rich heritage to future generations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mingei-international-museum.jpeg
Mingei International Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-havre-de-grace-decoy-museum.jpeg
The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mingei International Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mingei International Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Mingei International Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mingei International Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mingei-international-museum.jpeg
Mingei International Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-havre-de-grace-decoy-museum.jpeg
The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Mingei International Museum company and The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mingei International Museum company.

In the current year, The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company and Mingei International Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company nor Mingei International Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company nor Mingei International Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company nor Mingei International Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mingei International Museum company nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mingei International Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mingei International Museum company nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mingei International Museum company employs more people globally than The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Mingei International Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mingei International Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mingei International Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mingei International Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mingei International Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mingei International Museum nor The Havre de Grace Decoy Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H