Comparison Overview

MindWare Psychology

VS

CAMS-care // treat suicide risk

MindWare Psychology

121 West St, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22

MindWare is a Psychology practice providing therapy that is strongly based on research from neuroscience, positive psychology, mindfulness and other evidence based practices. We are an innovative and creative psychology practice offering individual and group therapy programs. Our focus is on the individual and making sure that they are supported through their journey of change in a respectful and positive way. We are committed to helping people find their full potential and are excited to see people make those positive changes in their lives. * Mind: Ware - We support people to develop the tools and ‘hardware’ to make change, using fun and creative interventions. We use technology and a range of mediums to develop these skills. *Mind: Style - We provide individual, tailored services to meet the unique needs of the person or organisation. We are motivated to assist people to develop a whole mind-body intervention, creating both a healthy life and a positive healthy mind style. *Mind: Change - Our aim is to support positive change and growth, to help people grow into the person or organisation you have the potential to be. Our psychologists have many years experience working with children, adolescents, adults and organisations.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CAMS-care // treat suicide risk

undefined, Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

At CAMS-care we are passionate about treating each person’s specific suicidal risk with empathy, collaboration and honesty. The Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS) is backed by 30 years of clinical research. Within the CAMS Framework we never shame or blame, we strive to understand the patient’s suffering through their eyes in an empathic, non-judgmental way. CAMS targets and treats patient-defined problems that make them suicidal. The CAMS framework is flexible, can be learned quickly, and can be adapted to a range of theoretical approaches and the spectrum of clinical settings.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindware-psychology.jpeg
MindWare Psychology
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cams-care.jpeg
CAMS-care // treat suicide risk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MindWare Psychology
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CAMS-care // treat suicide risk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MindWare Psychology in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CAMS-care // treat suicide risk in 2026.

Incident History — MindWare Psychology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MindWare Psychology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CAMS-care // treat suicide risk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CAMS-care // treat suicide risk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindware-psychology.jpeg
MindWare Psychology
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cams-care.jpeg
CAMS-care // treat suicide risk
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MindWare Psychology company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CAMS-care // treat suicide risk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CAMS-care // treat suicide risk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MindWare Psychology company.

In the current year, CAMS-care // treat suicide risk company and MindWare Psychology company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CAMS-care // treat suicide risk company nor MindWare Psychology company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CAMS-care // treat suicide risk company nor MindWare Psychology company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CAMS-care // treat suicide risk company nor MindWare Psychology company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MindWare Psychology company nor CAMS-care // treat suicide risk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MindWare Psychology nor CAMS-care // treat suicide risk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MindWare Psychology company nor CAMS-care // treat suicide risk company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CAMS-care // treat suicide risk company employs more people globally than MindWare Psychology company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither MindWare Psychology nor CAMS-care // treat suicide risk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MindWare Psychology nor CAMS-care // treat suicide risk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MindWare Psychology nor CAMS-care // treat suicide risk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MindWare Psychology nor CAMS-care // treat suicide risk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MindWare Psychology nor CAMS-care // treat suicide risk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MindWare Psychology nor CAMS-care // treat suicide risk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N