Comparison Overview

Mindstrong

VS

Dallas CBT

Mindstrong

101 Jefferson Dr #228, Menlo Park, California, 94025, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Mindstrong is a virtual mental health platform that combines care, data and technology to help members do better, feel better & stay better. We offer mental health care with the strength to tackle anything and have helped thousands of members grow and improve their mental health— including those with serious mental illness. Our mission is to meet members where they are and provide them with the quality care they need at every step of their mental wellness journey. By combining mental health care with data and innovative technology, Mindstrong is continually improving outcomes for our members and reducing their total cost of care. Our growing team of 170+ employees is made up of brilliant people who are passionate about changing mental health. We’ve led consumer technology companies at places like Google, Apple, and Evernote and our clinical and healthcare professionals hail from acclaimed organizations like Stanford Health Care, Harvard Medical School, UnitedHealth Group, and Optum. We’re a remote-first company with an office in the Bay Area. Backed by industry leading investors like General Catalyst, Bezos Expeditions, and Foresite Capital, we’re in our Series C and have raised a total of $145M in funding. If you're passionate about providing mental health care for all, no matter how serious or complex— don't hesitate to reach out. We'd love to talk more!

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dallas CBT

3500 Oak Lawn Ave, Dallas, Texas, 75219, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Dallas CBT is an outpatient therapy clinic that specializes in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), an evidence-based and effective approach to treating anxiety, depression, OCD, health and medical issues. We treat children, adults, couples, and families. CBT involves identifying and changing thought and behavior patterns that fuel negative emotions and create problems in your life. Our therapy is active and solution-focused and involves collaboratively setting concrete and measurable goals, increasing your understanding of the factors contributing to your problems, and developing strategies and tools to address problems in a new way. Dallas CBT also provide assessment for ADHD and Learning Disorders. Our comprehensive assessments determine accurate diagnoses, recommendations for treatment, and whether academic and test-taking accommodations are needed.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindstrong.jpeg
Mindstrong
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dallas-cbt.jpeg
Dallas CBT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mindstrong
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dallas CBT
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mindstrong in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dallas CBT in 2026.

Incident History — Mindstrong (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mindstrong cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dallas CBT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dallas CBT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindstrong.jpeg
Mindstrong
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dallas-cbt.jpeg
Dallas CBT
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Dallas CBT company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mindstrong company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dallas CBT company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mindstrong company.

In the current year, Dallas CBT company and Mindstrong company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dallas CBT company nor Mindstrong company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dallas CBT company nor Mindstrong company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dallas CBT company nor Mindstrong company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mindstrong company nor Dallas CBT company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mindstrong nor Dallas CBT holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mindstrong company nor Dallas CBT company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mindstrong company employs more people globally than Dallas CBT company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Mindstrong nor Dallas CBT holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mindstrong nor Dallas CBT holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mindstrong nor Dallas CBT holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mindstrong nor Dallas CBT holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mindstrong nor Dallas CBT holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mindstrong nor Dallas CBT holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N