Comparison Overview

ieso UK

VS

South Lane Mental Health

ieso UK

The Bradfield Centre 184 Cambridge Science Park, Milton Road, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, GB, CB4 OGA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://mindlercare.com/uk/partnerships/

Better mental health partnerships start here. Mindler partners with the NHS, insurers, and employers to deliver effective, evidence-based mental health care through digital innovation and clinical excellence. We provide flexible psychological support for adults, young people, families, and neurodivergent individuals, combining high-quality therapy with scalable digital solutions. 270,000+ patients supported globally 1,000+ clinicians globally 4.9/5 therapist rating To learn more: mindlercare.com/uk/partnerships Small-print for Recruitment Agencies ieso does not accept CVs submitted by recruitment agents in any situation where we have not directly engaged your company, in writing within the last two calendar months, to supply candidates for a specific vacancy. Any CVs received in this manner will be treated as the property of ieso, and any agency Terms & Conditions associated with the use of such CVs will be considered null and void. The handling of personal data for recruitment purposes is covered in our Privacy Notice.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 310
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

South Lane Mental Health

1345 Birch Ave, Cottage Grove, Oregon, 97424-1307, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.slmh.org

SOUTH LANE MENTAL HEALTH is a non-profit community mental health organization serving southern Lane County. Since 1988, South Lane Mental Health has been committed to helping people affected by mental illness and emotional problems, to better understand their condition and take steps toward recovery and living independently and productively in the community.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindleruk.jpeg
ieso UK
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-lane-mental-health-svc.jpeg
South Lane Mental Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ieso UK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
South Lane Mental Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ieso UK in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South Lane Mental Health in 2026.

Incident History — ieso UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ieso UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — South Lane Mental Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South Lane Mental Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindleruk.jpeg
ieso UK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/south-lane-mental-health-svc.jpeg
South Lane Mental Health
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

South Lane Mental Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ieso UK company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, South Lane Mental Health company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ieso UK company.

In the current year, South Lane Mental Health company and ieso UK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither South Lane Mental Health company nor ieso UK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither South Lane Mental Health company nor ieso UK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither South Lane Mental Health company nor ieso UK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ieso UK company nor South Lane Mental Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ieso UK nor South Lane Mental Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ieso UK company nor South Lane Mental Health company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ieso UK company employs more people globally than South Lane Mental Health company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither ieso UK nor South Lane Mental Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ieso UK nor South Lane Mental Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ieso UK nor South Lane Mental Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ieso UK nor South Lane Mental Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ieso UK nor South Lane Mental Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ieso UK nor South Lane Mental Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References