Comparison Overview

DWF (Legal Operations)

VS

Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.

DWF (Legal Operations)

425 S Financial Pl, Chicago, Illinois, 60605, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

DWF's Legal Operations Division (formerly Mindcrest) is the Group's alternative legal services provider, serving major corporates and law firms, globally. We deploy process efficiencies, technology and best-shore solutions to create better outcomes for our clients. As the pioneer in creating the ALSP market, we continue to redefine legal services by combining experienced teams, innovative processes, pioneering technology and data analytics. Recognised by Chambers Global as a Band 1 ALSP, we drive efficiency, scale and quality for our clients whilst reducing legal spend. Our team applies in-depth expertise across a wide range of industries, connecting solutions with challenges to drive results and building lasting partnerships. Outsourcing specific legal tasks to our experienced colleagues allows our in-house clients to focus on more commercial activities that allow them to differentiate and grow.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.

1300 N Semoran Blvd, 120, Orlando, Florida, US, 32807
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. (OCJ)'s mission is to bridge the access to justice gap in Central Florida by using technology, education and innovative programs to reach a wide range of underserved communities. We are committed to providing legal relief to vulnerable and underrepresented populations in Florida with a focus on newcomers through a holistic healing lens. As people navigate their legal process and reach stability, we walk alongside them, advocating, helping them to share their story and empowering them to build a path that enables them to be a voice for systemic change.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindcrestinc.jpeg
DWF (Legal Operations)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orlando-center-for-justice.jpeg
Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DWF (Legal Operations)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DWF (Legal Operations) in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — DWF (Legal Operations) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DWF (Legal Operations) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindcrestinc.jpeg
DWF (Legal Operations)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/orlando-center-for-justice.jpeg
Orlando Center for Justice, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DWF (Legal Operations) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DWF (Legal Operations) company.

In the current year, Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. company and DWF (Legal Operations) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. company nor DWF (Legal Operations) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. company nor DWF (Legal Operations) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. company nor DWF (Legal Operations) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DWF (Legal Operations) company nor Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DWF (Legal Operations) nor Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DWF (Legal Operations) company nor Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DWF (Legal Operations) company employs more people globally than Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither DWF (Legal Operations) nor Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DWF (Legal Operations) nor Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DWF (Legal Operations) nor Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DWF (Legal Operations) nor Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DWF (Legal Operations) nor Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DWF (Legal Operations) nor Orlando Center for Justice, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X