Comparison Overview

Mind Australia

VS

Lindner Center of HOPE

Mind Australia

584 Swan St, Burnley, 3121, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Mind Australia Limited is one of the country’s leading community-managed specialist mental health service providers. We have been supporting people dealing with the day-to-day impacts of mental illness, as well as their families, friends and carers for 40 years. Currently we have over 60 service sites throughout Australia that, this year, will support 12,000 Australians on their personal recovery journeys. Mind is a registered NDIS provider. If you have an NDIS package, ask about our NDIS funded services. We believe that with the right kind of help and support, life can be better and people can and do achieve a life with meaning and purpose. We provide practical and motivational support that helps people to develop the skills they need to move on, thrive and improve the quality of their lives. It’s an approach to mental health and wellbeing that looks at the whole person in the context of their daily lives. We also know that every individual’s journey of recovery and wellbeing is a very personal one, which is why we are committed to providing the kind of flexibility in our support services that offers genuine choice and control. Together with One Door Mental Health and The Haven Foundation, we provide much-needed mental health and wellbeing support services across Australia. For information about services, call Mind Connect 1300 286 463 (1300 AT MIND).

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 813
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lindner Center of HOPE

4075 Old Western Row Road, Mason, OH, 45040, US
Last Update:

The Lindner Center of HOPE provides patient-centered, scientifically-advanced care for individuals suffering with mental illness. A state-of-the-science, free-standing mental health center, the Lindner Center of HOPE is a charter member of the National Network of Depression Centers. The Center provides psychiatric hospitalization for individuals age 11-years-old and older, outpatient services for all ages, research and voluntary, live-in services. The Center’s clinicians are ranked among the best providers locally, nationally and internationally. Along with the specialties listed below, we also specialize in Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), Brain Imaging, Psychopharmacology, and Psychotherapy.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 288
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindaustralia.jpeg
Mind Australia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindner-center-of-hope.jpeg
Lindner Center of HOPE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mind Australia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lindner Center of HOPE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mind Australia in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lindner Center of HOPE in 2026.

Incident History — Mind Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mind Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lindner Center of HOPE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lindner Center of HOPE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mindaustralia.jpeg
Mind Australia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lindner-center-of-hope.jpeg
Lindner Center of HOPE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mind Australia company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lindner Center of HOPE company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lindner Center of HOPE company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mind Australia company.

In the current year, Lindner Center of HOPE company and Mind Australia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lindner Center of HOPE company nor Mind Australia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lindner Center of HOPE company nor Mind Australia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lindner Center of HOPE company nor Mind Australia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mind Australia company nor Lindner Center of HOPE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mind Australia nor Lindner Center of HOPE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mind Australia company nor Lindner Center of HOPE company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mind Australia company employs more people globally than Lindner Center of HOPE company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Mind Australia nor Lindner Center of HOPE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mind Australia nor Lindner Center of HOPE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mind Australia nor Lindner Center of HOPE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mind Australia nor Lindner Center of HOPE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mind Australia nor Lindner Center of HOPE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mind Australia nor Lindner Center of HOPE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N