Comparison Overview

Mind in Camden

VS

Brook Lane

Mind in Camden

9-15 Camden Road, London, NW1 9LQ, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Mind in Camden provides a range of high quality services for people, both adults and young people, who are struggling with mental distress including: hearing voices, extremes of mood, anxiety, unusual beliefs and post-traumatic reactions. Our services: -An innovative peer support-led Phoenix Wellbeing & Recovery Service, providing a range of support options and workshops for people no matter where they live -Healthy Minds Community Programme: supporting local people to reconnect with their interests and goals by engaging in activities and courses and building positive connections with the local community -A Social Prescribing Service that works in partnership with community providers to deliver easily accessible one-to-one support to Camden residents struggling with their mental health. The main aim of the service is to support people to access community services, projects and activities to aid their mental health recovery based in GP surgeries and a local hospital -A Cultural Advocacy Project supporting community groups and organisations to promote wellbeing and support individuals and families to look after their mental health -Voice Collective, an information, support and capacity building project that aims to improve services for children and young people across London and beyond -A project in local schools in partnership with a youth project to provide peer mentoring services for young people -The Hearing Voices Prisons Project, Voices Unlocked, which develops sustainable Hearing Voices peer support groups throughout prisons and secure units in London, the Home Counties and other parts of the UK. We also work with people who hear voices and are refugees and asylum seekers detained in Immigration Removal Centres, as well as young refugees, asylum seekers and migrants who hear voices -We are the lead organisation in the London Hearing Voices Network and the London Paranoia & Beliefs Network which, together, support 60 peer support groups across the capital

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brook Lane

13121 Brook Lane , Hagerstown, Maryland, 21742, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Brook Lane is a non-profit mental health organization with more than 500 employees providing mental health care to individuals across Western Maryland and the Eastern Panhandle region. Our main campus in Hagerstown, MD is home to one of Maryland's largest private mental health hospitals with 58 beds. Brook Lane also has two additional campuses throughout Hagerstown and Frederick, MD; providing many services, including: • Inpatient, Outpatient Therapy, and Partial Hospitalization for Adults, Children & Adolescents • Private K-12 Special Education School (Laurel Hall) • Family-focused program assisting children in building relationships, developing positive coping and communication skills (THRIVE) • Substance Use Treatment Program for Adults (InStep) • Spiritual Care • Continuing Education Seminars • Free Community Events Brook Lane's mission is to help individuals improve their emotional and behavioral well-being through education and treatment. Visit www.brooklane.org for more information about Brook Lane or to begin your first step to Hope, Healing, and Recovery.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 222
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mind-in-camden.jpeg
Mind in Camden
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brook-lane-health-services.jpeg
Brook Lane
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mind in Camden
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brook Lane
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mind in Camden in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brook Lane in 2026.

Incident History — Mind in Camden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mind in Camden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brook Lane (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brook Lane cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mind-in-camden.jpeg
Mind in Camden
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brook-lane-health-services.jpeg
Brook Lane
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brook Lane company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mind in Camden company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brook Lane company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mind in Camden company.

In the current year, Brook Lane company and Mind in Camden company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brook Lane company nor Mind in Camden company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brook Lane company nor Mind in Camden company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brook Lane company nor Mind in Camden company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mind in Camden company nor Brook Lane company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mind in Camden nor Brook Lane holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mind in Camden company nor Brook Lane company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Brook Lane company employs more people globally than Mind in Camden company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Mind in Camden nor Brook Lane holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mind in Camden nor Brook Lane holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mind in Camden nor Brook Lane holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mind in Camden nor Brook Lane holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mind in Camden nor Brook Lane holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mind in Camden nor Brook Lane holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N