Comparison Overview

Mily

VS

Compass

Mily

6 E 43rd St, New York, New York, 10017, US
Last Update: 2025-03-20 (UTC)
Between 750 and 799

Mily is a national residential brand and manager built for families, but made for everyone. Through thoughtful, tech-enabled property operations, Mily delivers elevated residences and refreshingly great service across the US. For renters, Mily provides family-focused specialty services and a built-in community perfect for anyone craving a stress-free living experience. For real estate partners, Mily differentiates real estate assets and appeals to a market that is increasingly priced out of home-buying options. Mily has four Class A buildings in its portfolio alongside its robust development pipeline and is part of the Common Living family of brands.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compass

90 Fifth Avenue, None, New York, NY, US, 10011
Last Update: 2025-08-05 (UTC)

Compass is a real estate technology company with a powerful end-to-end platform that supports the entire buying and selling workflow. We deliver an incomparable experience to both agents and their clients all in service of the Compass mission: to help everyone find their place in the world. Founded in 2012 by Ori Allon and Robert Reffkin, Compass operates in 22+ regions across the United States including New York, Los Angeles and Orange County, Chicago, San Francisco, Boston, Washington D.C., South Florida, The Hamptons, Santa Barbara & Montecito, San Diego, Seattle & Eastside, Philadelphia, Connecticut, Westchester, Aspen, Boulder, Denver, Atlanta, Austin & Central Texas, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston, Nashville, and Lake Tahoe. Learn more and find your place at www.compass.com and www.compass.com/careers.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 31,402
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mily-living.jpeg
Mily
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compassinc.jpeg
Compass
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mily
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Compass
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mily in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Compass in 2025.

Incident History — Mily (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mily cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Compass (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Compass cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mily-living.jpeg
Mily
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/compassinc.jpeg
Compass
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Compass company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Mily company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Compass company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Mily company has not reported any.

In the current year, Compass company and Mily company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Compass company nor Mily company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Compass company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Mily company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Compass company nor Mily company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mily company nor Compass company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mily nor Compass holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mily company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Compass company.

Compass company employs more people globally than Mily company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Neither Mily nor Compass holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mily nor Compass holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mily nor Compass holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mily nor Compass holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mily nor Compass holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mily nor Compass holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sakai is a Collaboration and Learning Environment. Prior to versions 23.5 and 25.0, EncryptionUtilityServiceImpl initialized an AES256TextEncryptor password (serverSecretKey) using RandomStringUtils with the default java.util.Random. java.util.Random is a non‑cryptographic PRNG and can be predicted from limited state/seed information (e.g., start time window), substantially reducing the effective search space of the generated key. An attacker who can obtain ciphertexts (e.g., exported or at‑rest strings protected by this service) and approximate the PRNG seed can feasibly reconstruct the serverSecretKey and decrypt affected data. SAK-49866 is patched in Sakai 23.5, 25.0, and trunk.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.6
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to large memory usage. This requires parsing the content stream of a page using the LZWDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

pypdf is a free and open-source pure-python PDF library. Prior to version 6.1.3, an attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to an infinite loop. This requires parsing the content stream of a page which has an inline image using the DCTDecode filter. This has been fixed in pypdf version 6.1.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Authlib is a Python library which builds OAuth and OpenID Connect servers. Prior to version 1.6.5, Authlib’s JWE zip=DEF path performs unbounded DEFLATE decompression. A very small ciphertext can expand into tens or hundreds of megabytes on decrypt, allowing an attacker who can supply decryptable tokens to exhaust memory and CPU and cause denial of service. This issue has been patched in version 1.6.5. Workarounds for this issue involve rejecting or stripping zip=DEF for inbound JWEs at the application boundary, forking and add a bounded decompression guard via decompressobj().decompress(data, MAX_SIZE)) and returning an error when output exceeds a safe limit, or enforcing strict maximum token sizes and fail fast on oversized inputs; combine with rate limiting.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.4.2, OpenBao's audit log did not appropriately redact fields when relevant subsystems sent []byte response parameters rather than strings. This includes, but is not limited to sys/raw with use of encoding=base64, all data would be emitted unredacted to the audit log, and Transit, when performing a signing operation with a derived Ed25519 key, would emit public keys to the audit log. This issue has been patched in OpenBao 2.4.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:P/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X