Comparison Overview

Millies Engineering Group

VS

Hatcher Engineering

Millies Engineering Group

9711 Valparaiso Drive, Munster, IN, 46321, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Millies Engineering Group is a MEP Consulting Engineering Firm serving Architecture Firms and Facility Owners in the Midwest for over 45 years, providing experienced, integrated, sustainable design solutions for the built environment. Education, Healthcare and Municipal projects continue to be our primary areas of expertise with significant additional experience in Commercial, Data Centers, Religious, Hospitality, Industrial and Recreational projects. Engineering Services include MEP Design, LEED Design Services, Energy Modeling, Commissioning, Feasibility Studies, Facility Assessments, Life Safety Surveys, and Building Information Modeling(BIM) and Net Operating Income Improvements (NOII).

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hatcher Engineering

2108 West Risk Street , Plant City, Florida, 33563, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Hatcher Engineering, Inc. (HEI) specializes in offering fire protection engineering and consulting services to a broad range of clients in the construction industry and property management business. With offices in both Plant City and Oldsmar, we are conveniently located about 30 minutes from downtown Tampa. Our services include, but are not limited to, hazard analysis, fire sprinkler and suppression system design, fire alarm and mass notification system design, special hazard system design, 3rd party plan review, and building code \ life safety code consulting. HEI offers conscientious, individualized service, provided by fire protection professionals dedicated to quality client service. OUR SERVICES Fire protection engineers not only play a pivotal role as a "specialty"​ service to Architects, Engineers, Contractors, & Owners on monumental projects, they can also help bridge the gap between codes and design solutions on what are typically considered "simple projects"​. It is our experience that providing a well thought out fire protection plan, prior to construction, will ensure flexible and cost effective solutions. DESIGN & CONSULTING - Fire Sprinkler Design (Bid Documents, Shop Drawings, - 3D Piping Models for CAD Coordination) - Fire Alarm Design (Bid Documents or Shop Drawings) - Special Hazards Fire Suppression System Design (Bid or Shop Drawings) - Mass Notification System Design & Integration - Building Code \ Fire Code \ Life Safety Code Consulting - Fire Modeling and Fire Hazard Effects Analysis - Hazard Evaluation - Egress Modeling - Life Safety Evaluations in Existing Occupancies - Peer Review and 3rd Party Plan Review - Construction Administration and System Acceptance Testing

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/millies-engineering-group.jpeg
Millies Engineering Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hatcher-engineering.jpeg
Hatcher Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Millies Engineering Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hatcher Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Millies Engineering Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hatcher Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — Millies Engineering Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Millies Engineering Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hatcher Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hatcher Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/millies-engineering-group.jpeg
Millies Engineering Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hatcher-engineering.jpeg
Hatcher Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hatcher Engineering company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Millies Engineering Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hatcher Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Millies Engineering Group company.

In the current year, Hatcher Engineering company and Millies Engineering Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hatcher Engineering company nor Millies Engineering Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hatcher Engineering company nor Millies Engineering Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hatcher Engineering company nor Millies Engineering Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Millies Engineering Group company nor Hatcher Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Millies Engineering Group nor Hatcher Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Millies Engineering Group company nor Hatcher Engineering company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Millies Engineering Group company employs more people globally than Hatcher Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Millies Engineering Group nor Hatcher Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Millies Engineering Group nor Hatcher Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Millies Engineering Group nor Hatcher Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Millies Engineering Group nor Hatcher Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Millies Engineering Group nor Hatcher Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Millies Engineering Group nor Hatcher Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H