Comparison Overview

Miles Printing

VS

nhs print

Miles Printing

4923 West 78th Street, Indianapolis, undefined, 46268, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At Miles, we build print communication strategies for businesses. Our clients get Design, Marketing Support, Printing - Digital - Commercial - Wide Format, eCommerce Site Build & Manage, Packaging, Kitting to Fulfillment, and Logistics that focus entirely on helping your business grow. We do that by implementing some of the most innovative processes available in the field. Embracing and exploring new ideas is the best way to empower our clients to succeed. With experience in printing on plastics and UV printing, as well as decades of experience working in highly regulated fields like Life Sciences, pharmaceuticals to medical devices. Miles has the tools to do it. And with our WBENC and WOSBCertification, you can be confident that you’re working with a women-owned business.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

nhs print

333 East Central Street, Franklin, 02038, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Since 1996, we have been a One-Stop Shop for all of your design & printing needs. Our services include graphic design, printing, signage, apparel, promotional products and mailing services. Our Customer Support and tenacious spirit to go above and beyond the need's of our clients is the reason we are still going strong. Your loyalty, patronage and referrals mean a great deal to our small business family. If you have a project in mind, we're here to help! Call us at (508) 541-8900. #design #print #directmail #eddm #printing #signs #signmaking #marketing #branding #logos #banners #screenprinting #embroidery #tees #tshirts #hoodies #promotionalproducts #customerservice #smallbusiness #nhsPrint #StandoutStandStrong

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miles-pop-printing-on-plastics-.jpeg
Miles Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhs-print.jpeg
nhs print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Miles Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
nhs print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Miles Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for nhs print in 2025.

Incident History — Miles Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Miles Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — nhs print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

nhs print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miles-pop-printing-on-plastics-.jpeg
Miles Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhs-print.jpeg
nhs print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

nhs print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Miles Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, nhs print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Miles Printing company.

In the current year, nhs print company and Miles Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither nhs print company nor Miles Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither nhs print company nor Miles Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither nhs print company nor Miles Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Miles Printing company nor nhs print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Miles Printing nor nhs print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Miles Printing company nor nhs print company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Miles Printing company employs more people globally than nhs print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Miles Printing nor nhs print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Miles Printing nor nhs print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Miles Printing nor nhs print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Miles Printing nor nhs print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Miles Printing nor nhs print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Miles Printing nor nhs print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N