Comparison Overview

Mighty Bear Games

VS

Epic Games

Mighty Bear Games

SG
Last Update: 2026-03-19
Between 750 and 799

wearemighty builds the AI infrastructure that powers real time creativity across games, agents, and chat based experiences. Our tools have produced 45+ shipped products, reached more than 6 million players, and compressed production cycles from a year to a week. Founded by veterans from King, Ubisoft, LucasArts, EA, Gameloft, and Disney, we have created games and experiences for global partners while developing the systems that now drive our speed and scale. Nexus, our CreativeOS, fuels rapid production. Agent Amy brings AI driven engagement directly into communities. Gifts.fun showcases the new entertainment formats made possible by our infrastructure. wearemighty is a values driven company committed to creativity, curiosity, and purposeful use of AI. We build accessible, community centered experiences and empower teams to create faster than ever before. We love exploring the edges of what is possible and building the technology that makes new worlds and new ideas real.

NAICS: 51126
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Epic Games

Cary, US
Last Update: 2026-03-29
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1991, Epic Games is a leading interactive entertainment company and provider of 3D engine technology. Epic operates Fortnite, one of the world’s largest games with over 350 million accounts and 2.5 billion friend connections. Epic also develops Unreal Engine, which powers the world’s leading games and is adopted across industries such as film and television, architecture, automotive, manufacturing, and simulation. Through Unreal Engine, Epic Games Store, and Epic Online Services, Epic provides an end-to-end digital ecosystem for developers and creators to build, distribute, and operate games and other content. Epic has over 40 offices worldwide with headquarters in Cary, North Carolina.

NAICS: 51126
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 11,921
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mightybeargames.jpeg
Mighty Bear Games
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epic-games.jpeg
Epic Games
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mighty Bear Games
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Epic Games
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mighty Bear Games in 2026.

Incidents vs Computer Games Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epic Games in 2026.

Incident History — Mighty Bear Games (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mighty Bear Games cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Epic Games (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epic Games cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mightybeargames.jpeg
Mighty Bear Games
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/epic-games.jpeg
Epic Games
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Political Motivations
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2016
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Mighty Bear Games company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Epic Games company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Epic Games company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Mighty Bear Games company has not reported any.

In the current year, Epic Games company and Mighty Bear Games company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Epic Games company nor Mighty Bear Games company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Epic Games company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Mighty Bear Games company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Epic Games company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Mighty Bear Games company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mighty Bear Games company nor Epic Games company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mighty Bear Games nor Epic Games holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Epic Games company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mighty Bear Games company.

Epic Games company employs more people globally than Mighty Bear Games company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Games.

Neither Mighty Bear Games nor Epic Games holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mighty Bear Games nor Epic Games holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mighty Bear Games nor Epic Games holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mighty Bear Games nor Epic Games holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mighty Bear Games nor Epic Games holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mighty Bear Games nor Epic Games holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H