Comparison Overview

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)

VS

Guggenheim New York

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)

1048 Washington Street, Cape May, NJ, 08204, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.capemaymac.org

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) is a multi-faceted non-profit organization that promotes the restoration, interpretation and cultural enrichment of greater Cape May for its residents and visitors. With a membership of more than 3,200, a paid staff of 160 and some 300 volunteers, Cape May MAC offers a year-round calendar of tours and special events that serves more than 300,000 people each year. Through its sponsorship of cultural and heritage tourism, Cape May MAC has helped transform Cape May from a "summer only"​ beach resort to the country's leading Victorian theme destination. Cape May MAC was formed in September, 1970 by a small group of Cape May citizens with the express purpose of rescuing the 1879 Emlen Physick Estate, an 18 room mansion, from demolition. Their campaign to preserve not only the Physick Estate but Victorian architectural treasures throughout Cape May has played a vital role in revitalizing the nation's oldest seaside resort

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Guggenheim New York

1071 5th Ave, New York, NY, 10128, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.guggenheim.org

Founded in 1937, the Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation is dedicated to promoting the understanding and appreciation of art, architecture, and other manifestations of visual culture, primarily of the modern and contemporary periods. The Guggenheim realizes this mission through exceptional exhibitions, education programs, research initiatives, and publications. The Guggenheim strives to engage and educate an increasingly diverse international audience through its unique network of museums and partnerships. With nearly three million annual visitors worldwide, the Guggenheim and its network is one of the most visited cultural institutions in the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 454
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-atlantic-center-for-the-arts-&-humanities.jpeg
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guggenheim-museum.jpeg
Guggenheim New York
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Guggenheim New York
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Guggenheim New York in 2026.

Incident History — Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Guggenheim New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Guggenheim New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-atlantic-center-for-the-arts-&-humanities.jpeg
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/guggenheim-museum.jpeg
Guggenheim New York
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Guggenheim New York company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Guggenheim New York company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company.

In the current year, Guggenheim New York company and Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Guggenheim New York company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Guggenheim New York company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Guggenheim New York holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Guggenheim New York company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Guggenheim New York company employs more people globally than Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Guggenheim New York holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Guggenheim New York holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Guggenheim New York holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Guggenheim New York holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Guggenheim New York holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Guggenheim New York holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References