Comparison Overview

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)

VS

Elmhurst Art Museum

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)

1048 Washington Street, Cape May, NJ, 08204, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) is a multi-faceted non-profit organization that promotes the restoration, interpretation and cultural enrichment of greater Cape May for its residents and visitors. With a membership of more than 3,200, a paid staff of 160 and some 300 volunteers, Cape May MAC offers a year-round calendar of tours and special events that serves more than 300,000 people each year. Through its sponsorship of cultural and heritage tourism, Cape May MAC has helped transform Cape May from a "summer only"​ beach resort to the country's leading Victorian theme destination. Cape May MAC was formed in September, 1970 by a small group of Cape May citizens with the express purpose of rescuing the 1879 Emlen Physick Estate, an 18 room mansion, from demolition. Their campaign to preserve not only the Physick Estate but Victorian architectural treasures throughout Cape May has played a vital role in revitalizing the nation's oldest seaside resort

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Elmhurst Art Museum

150 Cottage Hill Ave, Elmhurst, 60126-3329, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Elmhurst Art Museum is both a destination for scholars and fans of the architecture of Mies van der Rohe, and a place where people from all backgrounds and walks of life learn to see and think differently through art and design. The Museum is located 25 minutes West of downtown Chicago by car or public transportation in Elmhurst, IL.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-atlantic-center-for-the-arts-&-humanities.jpeg
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Elmhurst Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Elmhurst Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elmhurst Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Elmhurst Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elmhurst Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mid-atlantic-center-for-the-arts-&-humanities.jpeg
Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Elmhurst Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Elmhurst Art Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Elmhurst Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company.

In the current year, Elmhurst Art Museum company and Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Elmhurst Art Museum company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Elmhurst Art Museum company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Elmhurst Art Museum company nor Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Elmhurst Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Elmhurst Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company nor Elmhurst Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) company employs more people globally than Elmhurst Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Elmhurst Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Elmhurst Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Elmhurst Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Elmhurst Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Elmhurst Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cape May MAC (Museums + Arts + Culture) nor Elmhurst Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H