Microsoft Security Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (NETFACTIKBINONLMICAPPCONGOV1769182444)

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Microsoft Security breach identified under incident ID NETFACTIKBINONLMICAPPCONGOV1769182444.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Microsoft Security's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft-security, the number of followers: 515370, the industry type: IT Services and IT Consulting and the number of employees: None employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 770 and after the incident was 596 with a difference of -174 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Microsoft Security and their customers.

Gmail recently reported "Massive Exposed Database Containing 149 Million Credentials Discovered Online", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

Security researcher Jeremiah Fowler uncovered a publicly accessible database containing 149 million usernames and passwords, including credentials for major platforms and sensitive systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 149 million credentials, with nearly 149 million records at risk.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Database taken offline by hosting provider.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as The incident highlights the risks of unsecured databases and the widespread impact of infostealer-driven breaches. It underscores the need for better security practices to prevent credential harvesting and unauthorized access, and recommending next steps like Implement stricter access controls for databases, Enhance monitoring for unauthorized access and Educate users on the risks of infostealing malware.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 149 million usernames and passwords...freely accessible via a web browser and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating credentials were harvested via infostealing malware. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating infostealing malware, which logs keystrokes when victims enter login details. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Input Capture: Keylogging (T1056.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating infostealing malware, which logs keystrokes when victims enter login details and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 149 million usernames and passwords...including credentials for major platforms. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating infostealing malware...logs keystrokes when victims enter login details and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unsecured database containing 149 million usernames and passwords. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating credentials were harvested via infostealing malware and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating publicly accessible database...freely accessible via a web browser. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data destruction, but database was taken offline and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating database continued to grow, suggesting ongoing data collection. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unsecured database...freely accessible via a web browser. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.