Comparison Overview

Micronesian Legal Services Corporation

VS

Crown Law Queensland

Micronesian Legal Services Corporation

PO Box 5551 CHRB, Saipan, 96950, MP
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

MLSC is a non-profit organization which provides free legal services throughout Micronesia; we have offices in Majuro and in Ebeye, Kosrae, Pohnpei, Chuuk, Yap, Saipan, and Palau. At MLSC, we believe in a Micronesia where all people are treated fairly and with respect; where government and institutions are accountable even to the most vulnerable among us; where those who need legal services the most get the highest quality assistance to better their lives; where justice and fairness for all, even the poor, is the standard not only in our courts but in every community; and where communities thrive under democratic principles. Our mission is to promote equal access to justice and to provide high quality civil legal assistance to low income people. MLSC improves the lives of the people of Micronesia by helping them solve important legal problems; and strengthens communities through advocacy. We have a total staff of 42, including secretaries, trial counselors, paralegals, attorneys, and our administrative staff. MLSC is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, governed by a 9-member board of directors, with at least one director representing each of the regions in which we have offices. MLSC never charges for our services to the community. All our services are always free. MLSC is supported by by several sources, including each of the governments in which we have offices, the U.S. Legal Services Corporation, other institutional and government grants, and by individual donations. Our Board sets priorities for use of MLSC resources each year. The primary strategies MLSC uses for implementing these priorities include provision of direct legal services to low income persons, free of charge; collaboration with agencies and institutions; and outreach and community education.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Crown Law Queensland

State Law Building, Brisbane, Queensland, 4000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Crown Law is a self-funded business unit of the Department of Justice and the only law practice in Queensland dedicated exclusively to providing legal services to the State Government. Employing more than 220 legal and support staff, Crown Law advises and represents the Queensland Government in all areas of law affecting the State. Crown Law strives to be the Queensland Government’s first choice by providing premium quality legal services that protect and support the government in the public interest. Our practice is structured to serve the needs of the Queensland Government only. As such, our goals are focused on maintaining strong relationships with government agencies to provide relevant, informed legal advice and representation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 181
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crown-law-queensland.jpeg
Crown Law Queensland
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Micronesian Legal Services Corporation
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Crown Law Queensland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Micronesian Legal Services Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crown Law Queensland in 2025.

Incident History — Micronesian Legal Services Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Micronesian Legal Services Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Crown Law Queensland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crown Law Queensland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/micronesian-legal-services-corporation.jpeg
Micronesian Legal Services Corporation
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/crown-law-queensland.jpeg
Crown Law Queensland
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Micronesian Legal Services Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Crown Law Queensland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Crown Law Queensland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Micronesian Legal Services Corporation company.

In the current year, Crown Law Queensland company and Micronesian Legal Services Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Crown Law Queensland company nor Micronesian Legal Services Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Crown Law Queensland company nor Micronesian Legal Services Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Crown Law Queensland company nor Micronesian Legal Services Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Micronesian Legal Services Corporation company nor Crown Law Queensland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Micronesian Legal Services Corporation nor Crown Law Queensland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Micronesian Legal Services Corporation company nor Crown Law Queensland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Crown Law Queensland company employs more people globally than Micronesian Legal Services Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Micronesian Legal Services Corporation nor Crown Law Queensland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Micronesian Legal Services Corporation nor Crown Law Queensland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Micronesian Legal Services Corporation nor Crown Law Queensland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Micronesian Legal Services Corporation nor Crown Law Queensland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Micronesian Legal Services Corporation nor Crown Law Queensland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Micronesian Legal Services Corporation nor Crown Law Queensland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X