Comparison Overview

Microbot Oy

VS

Laser Dynamics, Inc.

Microbot Oy

Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.microbot.fi

Eero Mattila, with 30 years of experience with automation and robotics, has founded Microbot Oy, a company which specializes in finding robotic as well as traditional mechanical solutions for customers. Machine control and safety. In the new production machinery safety is already there. When modernizing old, but useful machines the safety regulations should be met like they were new ones. Microbot Oy is designing and manufacturing control and safety systems for renovated production machines with several years experience.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Laser Dynamics, Inc.

4881 Allen Park Dr., Allendale, MI, 49401, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799
http://www.laserdynamics.com

Laser Dynamics is a full-service, high-quality metal fabrication source located in Allendale MI (Grand Rapids). We serve many markets, including Furniture, Fixtures, Material Handling, Medical, Transportation, Electrical Products, Construction/Ag Equipment and HVAC Products. At our 88,000 sq. ft. facility, we operate multiple sheet lasers, including 2 new 8000-watt Cincinnati fiber lasers. We also operate 3 BLM fiber optic tube lasers, a turret/laser combo, 7 brake presses, CNC mills and lathes, and robotic and manual weld cells. We strive to form long term partnerships with our customers. Please visit www.laserdynamics.com for more information. Laser Dynamics is QMS - ISO 9001:2015 Certified by Intertek

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microbot-oy.jpeg
Microbot Oy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-dynamics-inc..jpeg
Laser Dynamics, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Microbot Oy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Laser Dynamics, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Microbot Oy in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Laser Dynamics, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Microbot Oy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Microbot Oy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Laser Dynamics, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Laser Dynamics, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/microbot-oy.jpeg
Microbot Oy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/laser-dynamics-inc..jpeg
Laser Dynamics, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Microbot Oy company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Laser Dynamics, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Laser Dynamics, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Microbot Oy company.

In the current year, Laser Dynamics, Inc. company and Microbot Oy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Laser Dynamics, Inc. company nor Microbot Oy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Laser Dynamics, Inc. company nor Microbot Oy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Laser Dynamics, Inc. company nor Microbot Oy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Microbot Oy company nor Laser Dynamics, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Microbot Oy nor Laser Dynamics, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Microbot Oy company nor Laser Dynamics, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Laser Dynamics, Inc. company employs more people globally than Microbot Oy company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Microbot Oy nor Laser Dynamics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Microbot Oy nor Laser Dynamics, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Microbot Oy nor Laser Dynamics, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Microbot Oy nor Laser Dynamics, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Microbot Oy nor Laser Dynamics, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Microbot Oy nor Laser Dynamics, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References