Comparison Overview

Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget

VS

State of Missouri

Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget

Elliott-Larsen Building, 320 S. Walnut Street, Lansing, MI, US, 48933
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Our mission at The Department of Technology, Management & Budget (DTMB) is to optimize enterprise-wide business, financial, and technical services to enable a government that works. DTMB impacts every area of Michigan government and our broad spectrum of responsibilities include: technology, labor market information, facilities, financial services, procurement, retirement services, real estate, the Michigan public safety communication system, and fleet and records management. Every day the contributions and achievements of DTMB employees have a direct impact on over 10 million Michiganders across the state. If you're looking for a fulfilling career in state government that can make a real difference in the lives of others, you can find your place working with us. We have opportunities in a number of career pathways, including, but not limited to, business and administrative support, finance, IT and computers, skilled trades and more. Join our team for an: - Opportunity to make a difference - Challenging and rewarding work - Competitive salaries - Fun working environment - Great benefits (community service, vacation and sick leave, paid holidays, paid parental leave, longevity bonuses) - Job stability and career advancement - Flexible alternative and remote work schedules - Tuition discounts and student loan forgiveness - Professional development/training - Employee discount plan From urban centers to beach towns to the great outdoors, the opportunities are endless in Pure Michigan. With your DTMB salary and benefits and Michigan’s affordable cost of living, you can explore all that Michigan has to offer. Ready to join our team? Visit www.Michigan.gov/DTMBCareers to learn more and find your next opportunity! #MiGovJobs #DTMBCareers #DTMBCares #HelpConnectSolve

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 1,471
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

State of Missouri

301 W High Street PO BOX 809, Jefferson City, Missouri, US, 65101
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Build the Missouri of tomorrow. Ensure a strong foundation today. Join a group of innovative team members focused on driving the State of Missouri forward. As public servants, our team members have the opportunity to produce work that is both lasting and important. This work serves to protect families, communities, and our natural resources. No matter where you are in your career, whether entry level or senior level, a career with the State of Missouri will challenge you to grow both personally and professionally. Though one employer, there is no shortage of exciting opportunities as there are many career paths you may take within the State. If you are searching for a job that transforms lives, including your own, a career with the State of Missouri is the perfect fit!

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 11,882
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigandtmb.jpeg
Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-missouri.jpeg
State of Missouri
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State of Missouri
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

State of Missouri has 53.85% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State of Missouri (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State of Missouri cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigandtmb.jpeg
Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Prevent identity theft and protect consumer privacy by strengthening data breach accountability and corporate safeguards.
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-of-missouri.jpeg
State of Missouri
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: phishing, malware, ransomware, AI-generated attacks, credential stuffing (reused passwords)
Motivation: financial gain, data theft, disruption
Blog: Blog

FAQ

State of Missouri company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget and State of Missouri have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, State of Missouri and Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget have reported a similar number of cyber incidents.

Neither State of Missouri company nor Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other State of Missouri company has not reported such incidents publicly.

State of Missouri company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget company nor State of Missouri company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget nor State of Missouri holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget company nor State of Missouri company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

State of Missouri company employs more people globally than Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget nor State of Missouri holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget nor State of Missouri holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget nor State of Missouri holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget nor State of Missouri holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget nor State of Missouri holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Michigan Department of Technology, Management and Budget nor State of Missouri holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H