Comparison Overview

Michigan Quarterly Review

VS

Monacelli

Michigan Quarterly Review

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Founded in 1962, the Michigan Quarterly Review is the University of Michigan's flagship literary journal. MQR publishes short fiction, essays, poetry, and translation four times a year. Twice a year, MQR publishes a special themed issue focused on addressing a single theme. Past special issues have included writing on the Flint Water Crisis, the Great Lakes, Greece, China, and Caregiving. Our magazine embraces creative urgency and cultural relevance, aiming to challenge conventions and address long-overdue conversations. As we continue to promote an expansive and inclusive vision, we seek work from established and emerging writers with diverse aesthetics and experiences. If you’re interested in subscribing, visit the “Shop,” where you can start a yearly subscription or purchase single back issues from our archive. If you’re interested in submitting, take a look at our Masthead for more on what our editors are looking for, then visit our Submission page for upcoming calls for open and themed issues.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Monacelli

65 Bleecker St, New York, New York, 10012, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

As a leading publisher of illustrated books for twenty-five years, The Monacelli Press has challenged the conventions of publishing to produce provocative, inspiring, and essential titles on architecture, visual art, interior design, landscape architecture, photography, and applied arts. In 2020, The Monacelli Press became an imprint of Phaidon. Since the publication of S,M,L,XL by Rem Koolhaas and Bruce Mau—a groundbreaking monograph that remains unsurpassed in its influence on design publishing—the press has produced more than 400 books in collaboration with prominent practitioners and scholars in diverse domains, including Rafael Moneo, Henry N. Cobb, Robert A.M. Stern, Piet Oudolf, Kate Orff, Robert Storr, Ellie Cullman, Paul Goldberger, Thomas Jayne, and Jean-Louis Cohen.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigan-quarterly-review.jpeg
Michigan Quarterly Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-monacelli-press.jpeg
Monacelli
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Michigan Quarterly Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Monacelli
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Quarterly Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Monacelli in 2025.

Incident History — Michigan Quarterly Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan Quarterly Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Monacelli (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Monacelli cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigan-quarterly-review.jpeg
Michigan Quarterly Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-monacelli-press.jpeg
Monacelli
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Michigan Quarterly Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Monacelli company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Monacelli company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Michigan Quarterly Review company.

In the current year, Monacelli company and Michigan Quarterly Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Monacelli company nor Michigan Quarterly Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Monacelli company nor Michigan Quarterly Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Monacelli company nor Michigan Quarterly Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review company nor Monacelli company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review nor Monacelli holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review company nor Monacelli company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Michigan Quarterly Review company employs more people globally than Monacelli company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review nor Monacelli holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review nor Monacelli holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review nor Monacelli holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review nor Monacelli holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review nor Monacelli holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review nor Monacelli holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.