Comparison Overview

Michigan Museums Association

VS

Archaeological Institute of America

Michigan Museums Association

PO Box 5246 , Cheboygan, MI, 49721, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.michiganmuseums.org

The Michigan Museums Association (MMA) is a catalyst for advancing Michigan’s museum community through shared learning, advocacy and collaboration. MMA has been supporting the work of Michigan museums for over 60 years. Our members include the institutions, professionals and volunteers of the Michigan museum community who believe that strong museums help us better understand ourselves and our world. Every type of museum is represented and welcomed, including art, history, science, military and maritime, and youth museums, as well as aquariums, zoos, botanical gardens, arboretums, historic sites, and science and technology centers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Archaeological Institute of America

undefined, undefined, undefined, 02215, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.archaeological.org/

The Archaeological Institute of America (AIA) is North America's oldest and largest organization devoted to the world of archaeology. The AIA is a nonprofit group with some 200,000 Members belonging to 107 Local Societies. Mission: The Institute promotes a vivid and informed public interest in the cultures and civilizations of the past, supports archaeological research, fosters the sound professional practice of archaeology, advocates the preservation of the world’s archaeological heritage, and represents the discipline in the wider world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 63
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigan-museums-association.jpeg
Michigan Museums Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archaeological-institute-of-america.jpeg
Archaeological Institute of America
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Michigan Museums Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Archaeological Institute of America
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Museums Association in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Archaeological Institute of America in 2026.

Incident History — Michigan Museums Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan Museums Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Archaeological Institute of America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Archaeological Institute of America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigan-museums-association.jpeg
Michigan Museums Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/archaeological-institute-of-america.jpeg
Archaeological Institute of America
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Archaeological Institute of America company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Michigan Museums Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Archaeological Institute of America company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Michigan Museums Association company.

In the current year, Archaeological Institute of America company and Michigan Museums Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Archaeological Institute of America company nor Michigan Museums Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Archaeological Institute of America company nor Michigan Museums Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Archaeological Institute of America company nor Michigan Museums Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Michigan Museums Association company nor Archaeological Institute of America company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Michigan Museums Association nor Archaeological Institute of America holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Michigan Museums Association company nor Archaeological Institute of America company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Archaeological Institute of America company employs more people globally than Michigan Museums Association company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Michigan Museums Association nor Archaeological Institute of America holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Michigan Museums Association nor Archaeological Institute of America holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Michigan Museums Association nor Archaeological Institute of America holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Michigan Museums Association nor Archaeological Institute of America holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Michigan Museums Association nor Archaeological Institute of America holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Michigan Museums Association nor Archaeological Institute of America holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References