Comparison Overview

Michigan 4-H Foundation

VS

Rich Gross Solutions

Michigan 4-H Foundation

446 W Circle Dr, East Lansing, Michigan, 48824, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1952, the Michigan 4-H Foundation is a not-for-profit, 501(c)(3) public organization based in East Lansing, Michigan. The foundation is organized and operated for support of Michigan 4-H Youth Development Programs whose mission is to prepare youth from all segments of society for meaningful and productive lives. Led by a 21-member board of trustees, the Michigan 4-H Foundation seeks, manages and distributes charitable gifts and grants from private individuals, organizations, foundations and corporations to support the mission and vision of Michigan 4-H Youth Development programs. Gifts to the foundation support: • 4-H learning experiences and volunteer training at a reduced cost. • County 4-H volunteer recognition. • State 4-H youth awards and recognition. • Outstanding 4-H alumni recognition. • College scholarships for 4-H youth. • County and state 4-H grant opportunities. • Creation of new curriculum and learning materials. • Development of new and current 4-H programs. • 4-H participant fee scholarships. • Development and maintenance of Kettunen Center, Michigan’s 4-H volunteer training center. • Development and maintenance of the Michigan 4-H Children’s Gardens at Michigan State University.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rich Gross Solutions

27426 Cedar Road, Hot Springs, South Dakota, 57747, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18

We believe the future of any organization requires a deep connection within the community in which it thrives. This is why many community and technical colleges have relied on our team of fundraising consultants to raise hundreds of millions of dollars from the private sector. Collectively, we strive to collaborate with leadership teams and councils to develop a stronger community bond.

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigan-4-h-foundation.jpeg
Michigan 4-H Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rich-gross-solutions.jpeg
Rich Gross Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Michigan 4-H Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rich Gross Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan 4-H Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rich Gross Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — Michigan 4-H Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan 4-H Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rich Gross Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rich Gross Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigan-4-h-foundation.jpeg
Michigan 4-H Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rich-gross-solutions.jpeg
Rich Gross Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rich Gross Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Michigan 4-H Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rich Gross Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Michigan 4-H Foundation company.

In the current year, Rich Gross Solutions company and Michigan 4-H Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rich Gross Solutions company nor Michigan 4-H Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rich Gross Solutions company nor Michigan 4-H Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rich Gross Solutions company nor Michigan 4-H Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Michigan 4-H Foundation company nor Rich Gross Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Michigan 4-H Foundation nor Rich Gross Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Michigan 4-H Foundation company nor Rich Gross Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Michigan 4-H Foundation company employs more people globally than Rich Gross Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Michigan 4-H Foundation nor Rich Gross Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Michigan 4-H Foundation nor Rich Gross Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Michigan 4-H Foundation nor Rich Gross Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Michigan 4-H Foundation nor Rich Gross Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Michigan 4-H Foundation nor Rich Gross Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Michigan 4-H Foundation nor Rich Gross Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N