Comparison Overview

Miami Signs & Printing

VS

Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc.

Miami Signs & Printing

2618 Collins Ave., Miami Beach, Florida, 33140, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Miami Banner Printing, Mesh Banner Printing, Grand Format Printing, Poster Printing, Vinyl Banner Printing, Step And Repeat Printing, Car Wraps, Custom Signs, Large Format Printing, And More! We offer affordable pricing fast turnaround and magnificent quality large format digital prints Give us a Call, Text, or Email today! (786) 505.5538 | [email protected] | 2483 W. 80th St, Hialeah, FL. 33016

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc.

185 Linnwood Road, Eighty Four, PA, 15330, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Pittsburgh Embossing Services (PES) is one of the leading suppliers of used plastic card equipment that embosses, thermal prints, and encodes magnetic stripe / smartcard information for use as credit cards, debit cards, gift cards, photo ID cards and membership cards. PES offers service for the maintenance of card and forms equipment as well as upgrades, parts and supplies. Personalization services for your plastic cards are also available in our Card Service Bureau. For 20 years, PES has provided our customers with the finest equipment sales and service options available. Member of ICMA, NFIB and FCCI.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miami-signs-&-printing.jpeg
Miami Signs & Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-embossing-services.jpeg
Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Miami Signs & Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Miami Signs & Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Miami Signs & Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Miami Signs & Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/miami-signs-&-printing.jpeg
Miami Signs & Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pittsburgh-embossing-services.jpeg
Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Miami Signs & Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Miami Signs & Printing company.

In the current year, Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. company and Miami Signs & Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. company nor Miami Signs & Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. company nor Miami Signs & Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. company nor Miami Signs & Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Miami Signs & Printing company nor Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Miami Signs & Printing nor Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Miami Signs & Printing company nor Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. company employs more people globally than Miami Signs & Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Miami Signs & Printing nor Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Miami Signs & Printing nor Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Miami Signs & Printing nor Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Miami Signs & Printing nor Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Miami Signs & Printing nor Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Miami Signs & Printing nor Pittsburgh Embossing Services, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L